March 2012 edit

Please stop making changes to Bleona's page without adding a source for this date. --Albinfo (talk) 07:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2015 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Bleona. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 23:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please STOP adding or removing info from Bleona's Page .This is Karen Sundall her official Pr . We are working to update her Wiki page and leave only the correct information after the latest Vandalism acts . Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by GetItRightFirstTime (talkcontribs) 01:49, 20 January 2015‎

Hi Barek Bleona Article is now updated with sourced information meeting Wikipedia guidelines. Please remove flag. Thank you. 718imaginations (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Hello, GetItRightFirstTime. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bleona, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Karst. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bleona without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Karst (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bleona. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Karst (talk) 00:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, GetItRightFirstTime. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Canterbury Tail talk 01:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Bleona.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Karst (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply