GeraltOfRivia2077, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi GeraltOfRivia2077! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Random character sequence. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to REDengine seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Random character sequence (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales (September 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi GeraltOfRivia2077! You created a thread called Am I allowed to contribute to wikipedia if i only contribute articles about CD Projekt Red and The Witcher at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Flooded with them hundreds 13:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Note on adding unsourced content

edit
 

Hey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded with them hundreds 13:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Ibrahim Mohamed Solih. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. - lollerwaffle (Talk) 00:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thronebreaker (September 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please Unblock me

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GeraltOfRivia2077 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I created the draft about the new Witcher game Thronebreaker (Draft:Thronebreaker). I actually want to help Wikipedia have more stuff about The Witcher and Cyberpunk 2077. I don't know what I did wrong. Please unblock me and tell me what I did wrong! Sincerely, Geralt of Rivia. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If the stuff you want Wikipedia to have is along these lines, it's better to leave you blocked. Huon (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GeraltOfRivia2077 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That's not vandalism. I was testing pages and seeing how Wikipedia works. Did I put anything obscene or rude? I think not. What makes what I did wrong? Please tell me. I created the article about Thronebreaker: The Witcher tales (See my draft: Draft:Thronebreaker) and I'm not doing anything malicious. Please explain to me what isn't allowed on Wikipedia and unblock me. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As you claim those edits weren't vandalism when they clearly were, it would be inappropriate to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GeraltOfRivia2077 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So then I will from now on only add facts and never do tests again. Please unblock me. I can do good things, like the Thronebreaker draft. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser-verified sockpuppeteer. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

October 2018

edit

  Hello, GeraltOfRivia2077, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Yennefer2077 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply