User talk:Gerald Waldo Luis/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Archive of talks, archived November 2020.

Palestine versus State of Palestine

I have changed it back. If you would look at the talk page you will see that the move to Palestine only was subject of an RM and rejected.Selfstudier (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Selfstudier, not to sound arrogant, but it is such a pathetic title. Why not just mention Palestine, like there is no article "COVID-19 pandemic in Palestine" that refers to the territory, plus it's a common name. I can see why the Palestine article is "State of Palestine," but the pandemic article? Plus the RM's no-consensus-ed, not rejected. GeraldWL 17:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

No consensus means just that. It doesn't give you or anyone else the right to unilaterally alter it without gaining consensus. I would prefer Palestine myself, the RM explains why this is problematic. Apart from that it is a good idea to be careful when editing any articles that relate to the Israel Palestine conflict, there is a notice on the talk page about that as well.Selfstudier (talk) 18:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Selfstudier (talk) 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Many thanks for your overhaul on Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese! Here is some tea to show my appreciation. Mojo0306 (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Cuties

Please stop changing the last paragraph of the plot summary without discussion. It's fine to do that once per WP:BRD, but after someone reverts you twice and you continue, it is edit warring. Sundayclose (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the draft maharashtra students welfare association

Hello Sir/ Madam Article written in more formal tone as suggested Thank You.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Cuties

"Premiered in the 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January, it was released in France on 19 August and on Netflix, 9 September" is an ungrammatical sentence. Do you know how to fix it? Sundayclose (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Sundayclose, it could prob be "It premiered in the 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January, and is released in France on 19 August and in Netflix on 9 September." Was released is tagged as a passive voice misuse when I put it on a grammar checker, so I assume it should be is-- didn't pass English when I was in school so unsure how should I correct it. What do you think? GeraldWL 16:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not concerned about passive voice; that doesn't make something ungrammatical. I can't rewrite the sentence for you, but you have written an adjectival phrase ("Premiered in the 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January") that is supposed to modify "it" but does not. If you separate the two parts of the sentence into two sentences, that phrase is an incomplete sentence. Sundayclose (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The version before your change is grammatical: "The film premiered in the World Cinema Dramatic Competition of the 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January, where Doucouré won the Directing Award. It was released in France on 19 August by BAC Films and internationally on 9 September on Netflix." Sundayclose (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Memories of My Body

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Memories of My Body you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Gerald Waldo Luis, it looks like you're new to the GA nomination process. You have opened a review on your own nomination, and that is not allowed. A review by an independent reviewer is needed. (You may want to take another look the GA nomination instructions on how the nomination and review process actually works.) I will be putting the review page in for a speedy deletion; until that happens, a valid reviewer will be unable to select your nomination for review. I wanted to let you know ahead of time. Best of luck with your nomination going forward. There is a backlog of nominations at the moment, so it may be a while before a reviewer does come along. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, sorry about that one, thought I was supposed to explain why I opened it for review there. Will wait for an indie. GeraldWL 07:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Memories of My Body, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro TV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
309		Pulmonary consolidation (talk)	Add sources
87		John Seigenthaler (talk)	Add sources
1,554		Griffin (talk)	Add sources
42		East StratCom Task Force (talk)	Add sources
16		Sony BDP-S1 (talk)	Add sources
54		Merpati Nusantara Airlines (talk)	Add sources
582		2012 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak (talk)	Cleanup
25		Cricket poetry (talk)	Cleanup
1,909		COVID-19 recession (talk)	Cleanup
3,461		Conservatism in the United States (talk)	Expand
751		History of Wikipedia (talk)	Expand
59		Guan Yi (talk)	Expand
165		Racism in North America (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
284		Chinese Wikipedia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,216		COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
800		Predictions of the end of Wikipedia (talk)	Merge
248		Television station (talk)	Merge
2,358		Spitting Image (2020 TV series) (talk)	Merge
715		COVID-19 pandemic in Finland (talk)	Wikify
814		Dots per inch (talk)	Wikify
202		British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic (talk)	Wikify
49		WebstaurantStore (talk)	Orphan
79		Peter Tuchman (talk)	Orphan
3		Tidung Island (talk)	Orphan
49		Disease cluster (talk)	Stub
50		Daníel Leó Grétarsson (talk)	Stub
18		Cure53 (talk)	Stub
145		Emergency use authorization (talk)	Stub
4		Westside Christian College (talk)	Stub
159		Greenwich Pizza (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)