User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 8
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Ashanti-Stool.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ashanti-Stool.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
re: question
Of course you can link to it. :) Just don't edit it, as is conventional with archives here. ~ Riana ⁂ 05:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- No - you can place links on the talkpage. ~ Riana ⁂ 06:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the talklink is blue, which should be enough. But if you like, I'll add a section to the notes saying that you've responded on the talk. ~ Riana ⁂ 06:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- No problem - once you've responded wherever you'd like to, just send me a note and I'll add the section. ~ Riana ⁂ 06:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the talklink is blue, which should be enough. But if you like, I'll add a section to the notes saying that you've responded on the talk. ~ Riana ⁂ 06:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Henry Clinton
I have begun a GA Review of Henry Clinton (1738-1795) and am notifying you that the article is currently On Hold for seven days so that corrections can be made. Skinny87 (talk) 09:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have failed the article as a GA nom for the moment. It needs significant work done to it to achieve GA Status, and I believe it would be better to continue to work on it and then renominate at a later time. I have left further comments on the article's talk page. Regards, Skinny87 (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)