User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 16
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Late Roman army
Thanks for getting this article through the review. It would have failed without your intervention. Best wishes EraNavigator (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like your opinion on whether Battle of Navarino, which I also authored, is good enough for A-class. Thanks and best wishes EraNavigator (talk) 19:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- By lead, do you mean the summary at the head of the article? EraNavigator (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, how does the summary look to you now? Any other comments about bringing the article as a whole up to A-class? EraNavigator (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Geoff, thank you for reviewing the article. According to Wikipedia:Good article criteria, "the presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement for Good articles. However, if images (including other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided." I would have preferred if the review had been put on hold so as to allow me to search for any appropriate images. --Phenylalanine (talk) 11:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I added a couple of images to the article per your suggestion, with more to come. Could you have a look at it now? Thanks. --Phenylalanine (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)