User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Frederick Tisdall
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Frederick Tisdall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.149.18.197 13:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed you pass this article, but you don't appear to of actually reviewed it at all, seeing as there's no review on the talk page. Are you planning on giving one in a subsequent edit? Homestarmy 21:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- In fact, several of your latest reviews show no evidence of any review. All articles which are passed or failed from GAC have to have some sort of comment defending the change, otherwise, there's no way to be sure if a reviewer is honestly grading an article according to the GA criteria or just stamping their favorite topic. Homestarmy 21:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Good Evening (GMT time); regarding your querie at the above page, just to let you know I've responded. Remember that this is my personal opinion, and not only is it not that of the Committee, but also this opinion will no doubt vary from member to member.