User talk:Geo.plrd/Archives2006-11

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MyWikiBiz

Regarding [1], please do not attempt to offer legal advice, and especially not in your capacity as a RFCU clerk. Please stick to the intended purpose of RFCU and direct all other commentary elsewhere; this applies even more so when you are acting as a clerk. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 01:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion by Dab in Sarasvati River for ref. sentences

Please check http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarasvati_River&diff=114746860&oldid=114729960 for my additions in Sarasvati River article. They are well ref. and taken almost straight from the writer. Then also Dab is deleting in the name of `grammatical'. Dab is deleting as they gives those informations which can give reader better understanding about whole subject ( but that is unpleasing to AIT/IAM theory supporters like Dab ).

So, I urge you to check it and write about it in the talk page. WIN 11:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

LaRouche intro

I'm going to remove this case from the list of MedCab cases. You can continue to mediate it without MedCab oversight. --Ideogram 12:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Geo.plrd/Embassy

I don't think this is an acceptable use of Wikipedia space, as it is in no way related to working on Wikipedia (per WP:NOT#WEBSPACE). Please remove the banner from Talk:Conservapedia, and find another way to act as a go-between for Conservapedia. Thank you. --Quiddity 18:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not certain what policy would stipulate, but I would imagine that it should be kept off Wikipedia entirely. You might like to ask at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) for a precise answer. --Quiddity 04:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The policy preventing this is WP:NOT, specifically WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Hostile and ultra-consevative Admins on Conservapedia?

Hi, I post this question/comment here since it seems your embassy might be removed in the near future.

background

I just posted the following entry on Conservapedia: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ASex&diff=47840&oldid=47807 and I got banned for it. I guess I shouldn't have told them/you we weren't married yet...

Also it seems I got infinite ban for the comment... http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:PER9000 PER9000 14:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Also I cannot contact the admins since I got banned on all pages. But I am encouraged to contact admins :-)

People like this (you?) scare me - I think this is worse then doublethink/crimethink.

some questions

• I'd honestly like to know your definition of family friendly.
• Also I'd like to know if you find it "appropriate" of an encyclopedia (even if it is censored) to tell nothing about sex (not even mentioning that sex is how all (higher) life reproduce)?

PER9000 15:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, this is also not the page to talk about Conservapedia, this is Wikipedia. WP:NOT also applies to talk pages. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

HignInBC: I agree, sorry about that - I'll try to move this discussion elsewhere. PER9000 15:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

GEO.PLRD: could you please post a reply to my using the form in my blog instead of on this page. Thanks. // PER9000 15:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Conservapedia

Geo, I think it might be best if you did not conduct Conservapedia business here. The two projects are incompatible on a number of levels. I note CP has email enabled, so I suggest you use that instead. Guy (Help!) 15:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

RFC on Starwood Festival

An RFC on the mention of child care and youth programming in the Starwood Festival article has been opened[2]. If you are interested, please read the information there and the discussion that led to it immediately above it[3] on the Starwood Festival discussion page. Your input would be appreciated. Rosencomet 19:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Last push for the Biography Assessment Drive

We've done great work so far on the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, reducing the 135,345 backlog by 38,626 to 96,719 as of March 20, 2007. We have only 6,720 more to go to get below 90,000. That would be outstanding and any extra effort that you can offer in these last few days of the drive (which ends March 24, 2007) would be much appreciated. If you haven't already, you may want to load Outriggr's assessment script in your monobook.js. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page. -- Jreferee 23:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Miss Mondegreen

Hi. Regarding your contribution here, please could you tell me what it is this user did that caused you to propose this? I ask because I have some recent experience where she has left repeated warnings on my talk page for offences that did not occur, and I wondered if there can be imposed any sanctions for such abuse of the warning templates. Cheers, --Rebroad 23:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I think a community ban is a bit strong based on the experience of Miss Mondegreen I've had so far, but if you're willing to provide me with some links that you think constitute anything stronger than keeping an eye on her, then feel free. I think she means well, and have no reason to suspect bad faith on her part so far. here is a recent messeage I left on her talk page, attempting to summarise areas where I believe is room for improvement. Would be interested to know if my experience with her is anything similar to what yours was. Cheers, --Rebroad 01:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)