File:Direct Changeover.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Direct Changeover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Certiport's Worldwide Competition on Microsoft Office 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Certiport's Worldwide Competition on Microsoft Office 2012 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Certiport's Worldwide Competition on Microsoft Office 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certiport's Worldwide Competition on Microsoft Office 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. no reason was given in contesting PROD `a5b (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply