Genesis20 78
Welcome! edit
Hello, Genesis20 78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vernon Jones has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Genesis20 78, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Genesis20 78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC) |
April 2015 edit
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vernon Jones seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 22:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Weegeerunner (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Understanding rewrites being rejected edit
I was asked if my sources more reliable after making an effort to rewrite an article. I used some of the very same references that was used by the edits before I made my rewrites. If something is FALSE and you rewrite to reflect such, why would that be deleted? The information I changed was from a more reliable source and sometimes the same source. Why are the edits not being allowed if we can prove the information is false?Genesis20 78
First paragraph: Jones was found guilty of racial discrimination in a federal lawsuit upheld on appeal in 2009.
This is a false statement and should be REMOVED. I cited the AJC as a reference.Genesis20 78 (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/dekalb-discrimination-suit-jones-ordered-to-pay/nQdqL/Genesis20 78 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
If the article is to reflect a living person and the rewrites show him neutrally in a more positive light, why would you keep the original content when it is false.Genesis20 78 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
The reference given [1] is merely the FILING document, it is not litigated and it is the plaitiff's claim. The article above tells that the ruling came back not exonerating Jones and the other defendants of racial discrimination. You allow this to be published yet when there is a correction to correct this, it is rejected. Why?Genesis20 78 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's better to have that discussion at Talk:Vernon Jones. Sjö (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Genesis20 78, I also recommend you take this discussion to the article talk page or discuss your concerns at the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. While a neutral point of view is necessary on all articles, there are special concerns when there are allegations against a living person. On the article talk page (Talk:Vernon Jones), you can discuss your edits with other editors working on this page. At the BLPN, you can discuss your concerns with editors who are focused on more controversial edits regarding living persons. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)