Gbfhbfjgvgf
March 2014
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boeing 767 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boeing 767 was changed by Gbfhbfjgvgf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954881 on 2014-03-09T22:57:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Linda (1997). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hurricane Linda (1997) was changed by Gbfhbfjgvgf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968398 on 2014-03-09T23:01:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at User talk:Inks.LWC . Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing 777, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - BilCat (talk) 23:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. BencherliteTalk 23:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Gbfhbfjgvgf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked I don't care I vandalized blah blah blah unblock now you fucking bastards
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've removed your ability to edit your talk page due to the attack above. Further appeals may be made using UTRS. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)