Gazpr
Contact me edit
You can contact me by email.
Discussion edit
Viktor Bout edit
Sorry to tell you I reverted your edits to the Viktor Bout page. I want you to contribute to this page, but I reverted your edit because you deleted cited material.
Besides the deletion of cited material, I feel your contribution was very helpful! Let's discuss improving the page without deleting cited material, ok? Fleetham (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I replaced the lead section and added more sections. I do appreciate you edits! They really improved the page. I replaced the lead because I wasn't sure why you removed the information to "Other". I think it's better placed in the lead, but I am open to discussion. Let me know if you're agreeable, and thanks again for improving the article. Fleetham (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I would ask you to look at WP:BRD. You're continual reverting of changes shows that your edits are disputed, so use the talk page of the article, instead of reverting. --Russavia Let's dialogue 22:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey edit
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Gazpr! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Proposed deletion of Marek Dochnal edit
The article Marek Dochnal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Subject is not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The article Rudolf Edlinger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GamerPro64 05:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Polski Gaz edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Polski Gaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 11:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Russian influence operations in Austria for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian influence operations in Austria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian influence operations in Austria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew hk (talk) 23:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Megdet Rahimkulov for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megdet Rahimkulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.