Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to thevillage pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)   Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Teesta Setalvad appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.Reply

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Teesta Setalvad appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Teesta Setalvad has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.cjpindia.blogspot.com. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Teesta Salvad edit

Hi -- although I understand the sentiment involved in your edits, I've also reverted them. You need to read WP:NPOV and WP:RS -- bits like "A firm believer in Justice, secularism and political accountability" don't belong in articles unless you are quoting a very impressive and reliable source. We also don't use our own articles as sources. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) and WP:BLP, particularly the latter, are also pages you should read. Thanks, feel free to ask me anything. Dougweller (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, my computer crashed as I was replying! Have you read WP:BLP, because it's got most of what I'd say to you, espectially the first section on writing style. I know little about Indian politics are her, but I've been trying to keep vandalism off her page. Dougweller (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply