Lowell Blanchard edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lowell Blanchard, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.atomicplatters.com/print.php?id=55_0_1_0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lazarus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lazarus was changed by Gassalasca (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-06-24T11:55:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lazarus edit

Hi there! Sorry for not leaving an explanation in my edit summary. The reason I reverted your addition to the "In modern culture" section in the Lazarus article is because the purpose of that section is simply to demonstrate that Lazarus is prevalent in a wide variety of mediums. There is no good reason to make the list of Lazarus-related appearances more complete or comprehensive in the music field than it already is. As we've discussed on the Lazarus talk page, the idea is to simply include a small number of the most-important Lazarus mentions. If you have a reason to believe that Dig Dig Dig!!! is any more important than the other examples listed there, then feel free to make your case on the talk page. johnpseudo 21:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Repetitor edit

Napravio sam neke male izmene u clanku o Repetitoru. U samom clanku se obicno ne stavljaju linkovi do stranica van Wikipedie, to sam popravio, Isto tako, ako se bend nalazi u kategoriji npr. "Serbian punk rock bands", nema potrebe da se nalazi i mu kategoriji "Punk rock bands". Clanak je trenutno oznacen kao clanak koji mozda i nije od dovoljnog znacaja za Wikipediu, kontaktiracu jednog od korisnika da malo prosiri i "nasminka" clanak (uradio bih to i sam, ali nisam bas ljubitelj "Nove srpske scene" i malo znam o tim bendovima) da bi ovaj tag mogao da se ukloni. Ostalocutanje (talk) 17:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply