Garrapata

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Morley Baer. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 11:18am • 01:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Morley Baer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

  jroe ^tk_cb  21:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Garrapata/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /talk 19:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Garrapata, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /talk 19:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Garrapata/sandbox

Hello, Garrapata. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Ray McSavaney

File:Bunker Hill Project,1981.png

contains compression artifacts

Hi Garrapata,

your article about Ray McSavaney is nice work!

May you please be so kind to upload a higher resolution versions of the Bunker Hill Project photo? It has some artifacts.

Cheers, Raupkopie (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray McSavaney has been accepted

Ray McSavaney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Book promotion

Several of your recent edits appear to be simply promoting a book (this for example) and have been removed. If a book has valid content, then use it to support article improvement. However, adding promotional blurb within article space is not the way to go. Repeated promotional edits suggests a conflict of interest and that is not acceptable. Vsmith (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Agree with what V said. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Garrapata. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Garrapata! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:27, Sunday, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Garrapata! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:35, Sunday, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

AfC notification: Draft:Vincent Richards Lee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vincent Richards Lee. Thanks! — Newslinger talk 18:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent Richards Lee (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vincent Richards Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vincent Richards Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 20:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent Richards Lee has been accepted

Vincent Richards Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Vincent Richards Lee. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Specifically, you removed a "failed verification" tag without addressing the issue. The Marine Officer Candidates School website does not mention Lee, and therefore it is not acceptable to use it as a reference. Similarly, you removed a "citation needed" tag but only added a link to the general Princeton Architecture page. Each reference must verify the information described in the article. Thank you! Jmertel23 (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Garrapata. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Vince Lee (explorer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

WP: TALK#CREATE

Connected contributor|User1=Garrapata |U1-declared=yes|U1-otherlinks=(Optional) Thank you for your editing work. I'm not sure I'm responding correctly to your comments, but here goes.

I slightly know the subject of the article "Vince Lee (Explorer)". We met about 12 years ago on an archaeological trip. Subsequently, I occasionally visited with him and his wife in Cortez - they're around 1000 miles from me. I did not know at the time what an interesting life he had had. Only when I bought his book did I find out. Over a year ago, I was in the area and visited him. I found him in failing health. I became concerned that the story of his life would be untold. So, I volunteered to write a Wikipedia article on him. And, of course, writing it without compensation. I don't write Wikipedia articles for pay. I wrote the article on Mr Lee out of friendship; I have absolutely no financial involvement - it was strictly voluntary. The prospect of his own Wikipedia article really perked him up. So, of the five criteria you enumerated, the only possible conflict that I may have is in the first one - through a tenuous friendship. It never occurred to me that it could be considered a "conflict of interest". In writing the article, especially in response to the Editor's comments on the first submission, I tried to maintain a neutral point of view, writing 'just the facts'. To my mind, it is written with that viewpoint.

I hope this suffices. If not, please get back to me. Garrapata Garrapata (talk) 05:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

A follow-up: When writing an article about a friend or colleague, it can be difficult to differentiate between what you find important versus what is actually noteworthy. Thie article Vince Lee (explorer) comes across as written a bit too much from a personal touch (articles should be dispassionate, not chummy and familiar). All articles, especially biogrpahies of living persons, need to abide by neutral point of view, which means covering all significant material proportional to their prominence in the published record. It's easy to gush over trivial details, or to downplay or ignore significant embarrassing/negative coverage, when writing about a colleague. Also, you cannot (in any article) insert your own opinions or interpretations of facts: statements like "he makes an intriguing case" are problematic if your own view.

A Conflict of interest can also include over-decorating articles of images with relative fluff, creating a tribute rather than a neutral, professional, encyclopedia article. Related, I see you've uploaded a lot of photographs to Commons of Lee sourced from the Lee Foundation (as well as other photos, some of which you claim to have created personally). Are you the copyright holder of these works, or a representative of the copyright holder? We take copyright violations seriously on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, and if the files are not clearly (and legally) released under a free license, they cannot be hosted on Commons. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Garrapata. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vince Lee (explorer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiram Bingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)