War Wounded

Welcome!

Hello, GangBang4k!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "GangBang4k", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is likely to offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult or impossible. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

@Sdrqaz: i changed my username, thanks for advising me. War Wounded (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear it; thanks for letting me know. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of national parks of Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of national parks of Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Photographs of maps in Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Category:Photographs of maps in Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of mountain ranges of Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of mountain ranges of Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistan national cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haroon Rashid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 07:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Log in to edit

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 11:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Recent Edit to 2023 Odisha train collision has been reverted

Your recent edit to the article 2023 Odisha train collision seems politically-biased. As a result it's removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.- Iamrajdeepdas (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Political Biasness

Please stop the bias in Anwar ul Haq Kakar page. The allegations are a fact. Allegations do not have to be true but it is a fact that the subject is controversial. Refrain from political biasness. Captain1212 (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

File:New2008 PFFlogo.png

Hi War Wounded, please do not re-add File:New2008 PFFlogo.png to Pakistan national football team, as it was determined that this file should not be used in said article as per this FfD. Please be advised that continuing to re-add this file will result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, FASTILY 09:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Police operations in Pakistan has been nominated for merging

Category:Police operations in Pakistan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Note

please do major clearing of karachi football league page 93.138.234.163 (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

2024 Pakistan general election

the PTI candidates all ran as independents due to the party being prohibited to appear on the ballot VosleCap (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments request

Hi @War Wounded I typically refrain from doing so, but given that my opposing editor has involved another editor (User talk:Saqib#Comments_request) to comment on the issues below, I'd like to request your valued opinion on the following matters at hand.

• Bushra_Bibi#Alleged_extramarital_affair, the conversation regarding this can be found Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Bushra_Bibi
• Also, share your independent opinion on Talk:PTI_intra-party_elections_case#Introducing_the_word_"controversial"_in_the_lead.

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Stop reverting referenced content

War Wounded, you have been reported before to ANI, and if you repeat your actions then this could result in a block. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Give your phony threats to someone else, not me. I'm not afraid of ANI. It won't alter my stance. War Wounded (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

No one is threatening you. You are welcome to edit. We simply want to ensure that nothing is censored. This is not your PTV. --Saqib (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

War Wounded, this is your last warning! or else I have to request a block due to WP:CIR-related issues. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Removal of military rigging

If you persist in deleting the line that reads the military's involvement in rigging the election, you may find yourself facing scrutiny at the Administrators' Noticeboard. There are numerous well-sourced paras in the section titled Analyses indicating the military's role in the rigging, and thus, it is imperative that this information be included in the lead. Saqib (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, War Wounded,

You need to be very careful when tagging articles for speedy deletion. I had to revert some of your taggings because of incorrect tagging. For criteria CSD G5, this is not because an editor is a sockpuppet. Editors don't necessarily get blocked for being a sockpuppet. This criteria is for "block evasion" of the sockmaster. So, when tagging an article, in the G5 field, you need to add the username of the sockmaster, not an accused sockpuppet. This is also because SPI cases are filed under the name of the sockmaster, not all of the sockpuppets. So, if an editor has a question about the article deletion, they will want to go look at the SPI case so the deletion rationale has to have the name of the sockmaster listed on it, not the editor who was recently blocked. And, at least for me, when I review tagged articles, the sockpuppet has to be confirmed in an SPI case or by a checkuser, it can't be based on suspicion.

I hope this makes sense. If you have further questions about the different CSD criteria, I encourage you to bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Zaheer Ahmad Babar

Who says it's not a reliable source? Show some evidence to the contrary, or else you should seek clarification at WP:RSN to determine if this meets the criteria of a reliable source. It's better to discuss before simply removing the sourced material just because you don't like it. Saqib (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Saqib The source you're citing appears to be a blog post hosted by an Indian propaganda outlet focused on monitoring the Pakistan Army, and it's worth noting that this is a BLP article. We don't necessarily need to resort to WP:RSN for every instance; as experienced editors, we should also rely on our editorial judgment. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I typically refrain from using blogs in BLPs. In this case, the source in question doesn't appear to be a blog, nor does it seem to be a propaganda website. However, if there are concerns regarding its reliability, I suggest bringing it up for discussion at RSN. --Saqib (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_429#The_Pak_Military_Monitor. --Saqib (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I do not think that was a fully thought out conclusion. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I agree that the discussion was quite brief. However, I insist on reopening the discussion at RSN. Additionally, I'd like to ask @War Wounded , if they believe this source (The Pak Military Monitor) is not reliable, why did they also remove the Friday Times source? Do they believe it's also an Indian propaganda website? --Saqib (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

However, the uninvolved editor's advice was to exercise "caution" when using that source, and their last comment suggested it's "probably" reliable. With such ambiguity, it's questionable whether it should be included in a BLP article. In my view, "caution" implies refraining from using it in a BLP article, and if used elsewhere, it should be accompanied by proper attribution. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I have made my point clear, and I again insist on taking this matter to RSN for further discussions. Though I will actively participate in the discussion there. --Saqib (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

@SheriffIsInTown: I am reinstating the content, and I insist that you take the matter to RSN if you believe it shouldn't be used on BLPs. Until then, you cannot remove it, labeling it as a blog hosted by an Indian propaganda outlet.--Saqib (talk) 12:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

@Saqib You do not own this space, a consensus to not use the source outside of WP:RSN is also a consensus. Two editors here are telling you to not use that source then on WP:RSN, there was no conclusion that the source is reliable. Additionally, you have been advised at WP:ANI to not use the source in a BLP article or use caution doing that, I suggest you revert yourself as you are in minority and open the discussion again at WP:RSN if you think the source is reliable as editors opinion on other forums is leaning against your opinion. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)