This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ganeshsiddha (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

now my content doesn't match with any another web site, & images are taken by my own camera while uploading which option shall i select Ganeshsiddha (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 06:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Ganeshsiddha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Samarth Pratishthan edit

I have noted your creation and maintenance of Samarth Pratishthan. However, the article seems to not be in-line with WP:NOT and reads more like a journal. Also, it seems to lack the ability to be verified and references. Do you require any assistance? Please note that it is possible that your hard work will go to waste if the article is nominated for deletion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Samarth6.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Samarth6.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.0.82.226 (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 99.0.82.226 (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 99.0.82.226 (talk) 11:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Samarth pratishthan 1.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 1.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Continued removal of tags, etc edit

  Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.155.206.229 (talk) 12:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think you quite understand Wikipedia guidelines, and that things haven't changed since someone raised these issues with you three months ago. Your sole purpose seems to be the promotion of one institution, and your continued removal of maintenance tags, without supplying any reliable sources that may establish the subject's notability or substantiate the article's content, gives the impression of WP:COI and WP:OWNERSHIP. Since the text appears to be nearly identical to that of the institution's website, it raises concerns re: WP:COPYRIGHT as well. Primarily you appear to be intent on creating an article without explaining your edits or attempting to correct the problems--I encourage you to read Wiki's guidelines. Thank you, 99.155.206.229 (talk) 12:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.155.206.229 (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Samarth Pratishthan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 13:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Samarth Pratishthan edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Samarth Pratishthan, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.samarthpratishthan.com/en/index.html. As a copyright violation, Samarth Pratishthan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Samarth Pratishthan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Samarth Pratishthan edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Samarth Pratishthan, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article deleted edit

I have deleted Samarth Pratishtan for several reasons. First, more than half of it was a direct copy of the group's website; this is a copyright violation. If you're interested in recreating the article, there are ways to donate that text to us so that it is in the public domain, but... The other problem is that the article was strictly promotional in nature. A Wikipedia article should never sound like a group's website. It shouldn't be in 3rd person ("we"), it shouldn't contain multiple links to the website...in short, its purpose should not be to "promote" the group. Wikipedia articles need to be factual, and they need to be based primarily on independent secondary reliable sources--that is, newspapers, tv news programs, academic journals, etc.--things completely unconnected with the band, that meet WP:RS. If such sources don't exist, then the group can't have a Wikipedia article. Since everything in the article was promotional, the only way to make a functional article is to start over again. If you need help doing that, please post here or on my talk page and I will provide advice. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Samarth pratishthan 13.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 13.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Samarth pratishthan 12.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 12.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Splogo1.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Splogo1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth6.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth pratishthan 12.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 12.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth pratishthan 13.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 13.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth pratishthan 1.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samarth pratishthan edit

 

A tag has been placed on Samarth pratishthan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. John of Reading (talk) 07:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please re-read the #Article deleted section further up this page.
Also, I saw from your comment at Talk:Samarth pratishthan that you are writing about your own project and website. Please read the conflict of interest page; this is strongly discouraged here. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Samarth pratishthan 11.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Samarth pratishthan edit

 

A tag has been placed on Talk:Samarth pratishthan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. John of Reading (talk) 09:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samarth Pratishthan edit

 

A tag has been placed on Samarth Pratishthan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Trying one more time to communicate edit

Hey, I see that you attempted to recreate "Samarth Pratishthan" and that it was subsequently deleted again for the same reasons. First, you have to understand that you cannot, under any circumstances, copy and paste information from copyrighted sources onto Wikipedia. You also can't copy them and then just change a few words here and there; rather, the information needs to be substantially rewritten. Second, you can't create a Wikipedia article just to promote your group. Wikipedia articles must be only about things that have been discussed in detail in multiple, independent reliable sources. In other words, you can't use Wikipedia to make your group better known; it must already be well known, and then Wikipedia can report on it afterward. Please, if you have questions about this, ask me here or on my talk page. If you keep trying to recreate the article, it's still going to be deleted, and, worse, you're going to end up blocked for editing disruptively. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samarth pratishthan edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Samarth pratishthan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 12:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know, I have now "protected" both of those article titles, which means you will not be able to recreate the article. Again, if you want help trying to make a version of this article that meets our guidelines and policies, I will help you do so, but you can't just keep trying to recreate the same article repeatedly without fixing the underlyign problems. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
And you cannot get around the problem by putting it on your user page. If you continue to add copyrighted text to Wikipedia, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Period. You've had plenty of warnings and offers of help, so now you need to begin following our policies or lose your editing privileges. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

How to keep the article edit

Okay, if you want to write a Wikipedia article on "Samarth Pratishthan", there are two main things you need to know. The first one is, you cannot, under any situation, directly copy information from another website, unless that site is in the public domain--the site you copied from is not. This rule is completely non-negotiable--there is no exception to the rule that says you can't just copy other webpages (or books, or newspapers, etc.). So, any information you pull off of that website has to be rewritten into new words--and not just changing a few words, but a major change to the content. In any event, the majority of that information you copied does not belong in a Wikipedia article.

The second thing is that Wikipedia only allows articles on things (people, bands, companies, etc.) that are Notable. The way we tell if something is notable is if it has been discussed in detail in multiple (more than 1 at least), independent (not in any way connected to the band or its members), reliable sources (like regular newspapers, some magazines, television news programs, a small number of reliable websites, etc.). Note that the band's own webpage, Facebook, Twitter, etc. are not enough to meet this rule. If this band has never been discussed in reliable sources, then it cannot have a Wikipedia page. This is basically the way that Wikipedia decides which things are encyclopedic enough to be covered, and which are not.

So, I guess the question I have is, has this band been covered in reliable sources? If so, please describe them to me with full publication information (newspaper name, article title, publication date, and an online link if there is one). Then I can help advise you about how to create the page. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continually recreating the same copyright violating, promotional article, first in mainspace then as your userpage. Ganeshsiddha, I have tried to help, but you keep disruptively recreating the same page. As such, I have had to block you. After you are unblocked in a week, if you still want to try making the page, I will help, but you have to stop just trying to force the page into Wikipedia. We have rules about how articles must be written and what things can have articles; if you cannot follow those, you cannot edit here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not blocked...so edit

Ganesh, you aren't blocked. Ah, but I think I know what the problem is--you're trying to recreate an article about Samarth pratishthan, right? Ah, the problem is that that page is protected so that it cannot be created by anyone other than an admin, basically because you kept recreating an article which didn't follow our policies. But there is a way to fix that! I created a "Sandbox" for you, which is basically a place where you can write a draft version of your article, and then I can review it before we consider adding it to the encyclopedia. In the search box in the upper right, go to "User:Ganeshsiddha/Sandbox" and edit that space. Then, once you have your new article up, I'll review it. Note that just fixing the copyright problem isn't going to be enough--you're going to have to show that the group meets WP:BAND (i.e., that the group is notable, has been discussed by independent reliable sources, etc.). When you have the draft done, you can leave a note here, and I'll take a look, okay? Let me know if you have any problems making that work. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply