User talk:Gandalf61/Archive18
Future Perfect edit
His closure of the Q was uncalled for, and especially his removal of your link to the guidelines saying a discussion should be left open for at least a week, where his edit comment said he was reverting you as a banned user (you aren't, are you ?). He also reverted my comment agreeing with you. If you would like to submit a complaint on him, I will support you. He also threatened to block anyone who reopens the discussion. This type of behavior, using Admin powers and threats, to get his way, is unacceptable. See this edit and the previous one: [1]. StuRat (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, I am not a banned user :) I assume FPaS was referring to 82.47.242.185 (talk · contribs) who restored my post before FPaS deleted it again. As regards FPaS's behavior, I pretty much agree with you, but I see no point in complaining at ANI or anywhere else. Admins always close ranks and support each other, and the response would simply be "maybe he was a bit naughty but he's a good lad really and he meant well ...". But thank you for your offer of support anyway. Gandalf61 (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I found your user account by searching through the revisions to the generating functions article, which my new article draft suggests as the main article for the topic in my page header.
Would you mind reviewing my related article located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Generating_function_transformation_(Mathematics)? It contains notes, listings, citations, and examples on transformations of generating functions, which is again related to the main article topic, but is of sufficient length and I think has broad enough topic coverage to have a separate article dedicated to it. I have been waiting for someone to review the article since I posted it as a draft 3-4 weeks ago. I guess math articles require special mathematician reviewers. Good job on the first generating functions article. Maxieds (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the barnstar. Your draft article is well written and interesting, but I notice that quite a few of the results are unsourced - I think it would be better with more references. Also, in terms of style, you need to bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a textbook. If you would like a wider opinion from the mathematics community on Wikipedia you could post at the WikiProject Mathematics talk oage. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Proof by Exhaustion edit
Based on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proof_by_exhaustion&oldid=prev&diff=779555197
I can see why you reverted this, but I would like to argue that the process of finding a counterexample would require case by case analysis. For less obvious problems, you might not always find the right answer on the first case you try. (Perhaps a better example should be used in the article?) Let me know your thoughts =) Popcrate (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Gandalf61. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Examination of Apollo Moon photographs for deletion (discussion here) edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Examination of Apollo Moon photographs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Examination of Apollo Moon photographs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 20:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Gandalf61. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)