User talk:Gamaliel/Archive 17
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/HelenHillMemorialCupcakeChickenHowieluvzus.jpg/350px-HelenHillMemorialCupcakeChickenHowieluvzus.jpg)
Hello, welcome to my talk page. To leave a new message, click here. Please try to keep it relatively organized by signing your posts, posting new topics on the bottom of the page, making relevant headings about your topic and using subheadings, not new headings, for replies. I will almost always reply on this page to messages. I reserve the right to make minor changes of formatting (headings, bolding, etc.) but not content in order to preserve the readablilty of this page. I will delete without comment rude and/or insulting comments, trolling, threats, comments from people with a history of insults and incivility, and comments posted to the top of this page. Also, I'm much more informal than this disclaimer implies. Thank you. Rock on.
Before you rant, please read tips for the angry new user and remember the most important rule on Wikipedia.
Archives: 3-8/04 | 9-11/04 | 11/04-2/05 | 2-4/05 | 5-7/05 | 8-10/05 | 11/05-2/06 | 3-7/06 | 8/06-1/07 | 2/07-12/07 | 1/08-5/08 | 6/08-2/09 | 2/09-09/09 | 10/09-2/10 | 3/10-2/11 | 2/11-6/11
DYK nomination of Kathleen Cody (actor)
editHello! Your submission of Kathleen Cody (actor) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I added some suggestions to the DYK page. Gamaliel (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- I still see a few problems. Could you see my comments at the nomination's entry? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
editIn light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
edit- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
DYK nomination of Fay Ajzenberg-Selove
editHello! Your submission of Fay Ajzenberg-Selove at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Number 57 21:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I've now marked it as good to go. Cheers, Number 57 21:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Glenn Mulcaire
editPlease don't suddenly redirect pages while people are discussing what to do. It's very rude. Please join the talk page discussion instead.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 08:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm very surprised by this reaction. You know that BLP (a policy you created if I am not mistaken) requires immediate enforcement. It's inappropriate to call someone rude for enforcing your own policy. Gamaliel (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
SPLC
editI hope you're keeping track of everyone else too. Or observing the bad faith discussion being conducted by TFD. Do I see you warning any of them? No. And why would I? You have a demonstrated dislike of conservatives. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Are other users on that page calling other editors dicks and buffoons? If so, please indicate who they are and I will have the same conversation with them regardless of their political persuasion. And if you continue with juvenile name calling, we will have this conversation again, regardless of your political persuasion, whatever it is. You can imagine whatever else you want about this interaction, but this is an official warning about your behavior on that page. If you think it is inappropriate you are welcome to post on a relevant noticeboard. Gamaliel (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wish I could respect you as acting in a balanced manner, but I can't. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome to ask another administrator of your choice about the appropriateness of your namecalling if it will put your concerns to rest. Gamaliel (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Kathleen Cody (actor)
editOn 10 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kathleen Cody (actor), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that years after long-time actress Kathleen Cody retired to Florida, she was cast in the Peter Bogdanovich film Illegally Yours when it was filming in her town. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Fox News Controversies - RfC
editAs you are actively involved in the current discussion, your consideration as to the editorial conduct inre the deletion of recently added comments/responses to the recently-listed RfC is solicited and would be appreciated. Thanks. JakeInJoisey (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've responded on that page. Gamaliel (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- I appreciate both your consideration and response. While I'm not sure that there's a real need for differentiating "involved" and "uninvolved" (except perhaps as some kind of placebo), there remains one bit of unfinished business that requires attention...Kmh's notion that an RfC placement editor can arbitrarily decide just who can and cannot contribute to an RfC. It's a WILD notion that I can't ever recall having been actually entertained inre any RfC I've ever seen. JakeInJoisey (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, it doesn't really solve any need, it just seemed a quick way to make everybody happy. As you said, a good placebo. I do agree that trying to restrict RFCs is generally a bad idea unless particular editors are being especially disruptive, but I think the placebo has blunted any further impulse of editors to "improve" the RFC by moving around comments. It looks like everyone is content with this arrangement so I think I'll leave it be and let everyone get back to content discussion as it seems to have started up again. Gamaliel (talk) 00:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- ...it just seemed a quick way to make everybody happy.
- It was...and my compliments and appreciation for your solomon-esque resolution. JakeInJoisey (talk) 01:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Bondi
editHey G, this thing with the dog has to be one of the most trivial additions I've ever seen. And located in "Early career?" WHAT? I repeat: is this the best we can do the Atty Genl of the State of Florida? Even if it was on the front page this is supposed to be an encyclopedia. For Pete's sake this is exactly why educators think WP is a joke. It's embarassing. – Lionel (talk) 23:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm a resident of Florida and lived in the county where Bondi worked as Assistant State Attorney. This "trivia" was a large front page story here. You may think it's a joke, the media here disagreed. When there's a 7000 character Wikipedia article about a guy posting underwear pictures on Twitter, this small paragraph hardly spells the doom of Wikipedia. Gamaliel (talk) 23:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
edit- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
DYK for Fay Ajzenberg-Selove
editOn 12 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fay Ajzenberg-Selove, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Fay Ajzenberg-Selove had to fight a discrimination case against the University of Pennsylvania to be hired as a tenured professor of physics? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Good call!
editWe edit conflicted here; I was adding the note myself but you beat me to it. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Holocaust denial
editHello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description. Please consider these data:
- What Does Holocaust Denial Really Mean?
- What is 'Holocaust Denial'? 109.77.71.153 (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- My suggestion would be to bring this matter up at Talk:Holocaust denial. Gamaliel (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Reinhold and Ruth Benesch
editOn 13 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Reinhold and Ruth Benesch, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Reinhold and Ruth Benesch discovered the key role played by 2,3-bisphosphoglyceric acid in the transport of oxygen by hemoglobin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Talk page discussion
editHey,
FYI, some previous edits you made to Michele Bachmann have become the subject of a conversation here. NickCT (talk) 13:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. Gamaliel (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Mal Stevens
editI want to commend your expansion of the Mal Stevens entry. Great job.== SLY111 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.91.55 (talk) 23:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 02:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Joan Berkowitz
editOn 17 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joan Berkowitz, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that chemist Joan Berkowitz made important discoveries in the fields of spacecraft construction and pollution control? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
edit- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
Bachmann
editOn this reinstatement: I think you'd better participate in the talk page discussion. (No need to respond here or on my talk page.) -- Hoary (talk) 05:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- My reply to your message on my talk page is on my talk page. ¶ But that was then; this is now: Arzel misses your voice in the conversation. (And I do too.) -- Hoary (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Georgine Darcy
editOn 25 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Georgine Darcy, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the mother of Georgine Darcy, an actress in Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window, urged her to become a stripper? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
edit- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
Joe Wilson
editI have added a section to the talk page on Joe Wilson (U.S. politician) which might interest you. Googlemeister (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
The Phelps Association membership directory lists a member with the entrant's name, Yale Class of 1871, but the fraternity link you found is as outstanding as it plain. Your link generates many questions for me. I write to state I did not intend to pass on incorrect information to users of wikipedia, no sir, and I wouldn't enter an edit war given you appear to have all your ducks in a row.68.173.89.63 (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)SLY111, nee SLY131.
- I have no interest in an edit war. If you have questions, you are welcome to pose them here. Gamaliel (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Reclusive conservative billionaires, anyone?
editThank you for catching that close paraphrasing at Tennessee Center for Policy Research. I had drafted that article in userspace some time ago, and before I moved it to article space I did skim it for potential issues I might have failed to fix earlier, but obvious I overlooked that reclusive billionaire! Thanks also for the DYK review. --Orlady (talk) 04:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. It was really a minor thing barely worth mentioning, but I wanted to be thorough since it was a political article and those tend to attract heat. Gamaliel (talk) 15:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, the potential for "heat" is one of the reasons the article languished in my user space, while I researched some related topics (notably State Policy Network) in order to try to make sure I was not misunderstanding/misrepresenting TCPR. By the time I got back to it, I didn't remember which snippets of text might have been copy-pasted while I was compiling information. Thanks again for your careful reading. --Orlady (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion
editStop telling me Welcome to Wikipedia. I have been here for 4 years, and I did leave my comments in the edit summary. --Andy0093 (talk) 15:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Then you should know better. Take it to the talk page or the BLP noticeboard. Gamaliel (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Malcolm Venville
editOn 31 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Malcolm Venville, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that director Malcolm Venville planned to make a feature film entirely in sign language starring Orlando Bloom? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Amanda Marcott
editWould this quote be appropriate on a wikipedia? Amanda Marcotte: "What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit?" It would appear that she did post this on her blog. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
I have a general question, sort of
editI like the quote on your user page: "When I am asked to look into cases of "admin abuse" and I choose to do so, I generally find myself astounded at how nice we are to complete maniacs, and for how long." - Jimbo Wales
which brings me around to my question (after a preliminary remark): I was reading the entry for Michele Bachmann and was surprised at how sanitized, for lack of a better word, it is. I went to the discussion page, and it gave me the flavor of what goes on with some of the more controversial personalities. But still, to leave out the crazy on Bachmann really, for me anyway, takes away from the credibility of wikipedia. Surely, this sort of problem is recognized by all parties....or maybe not. My question is this: are there any plans to address ways of dealing with telling the truth about a contoversial figure without appearing to be a complete whitewash of the subject? I have noticed that many of the articles on living (and even some dead!) public figures are truly cringeworthing in this respect.
Thank you.
24.125.236.149 (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC) Janicejstraub@aol.com
- Thanks for your comment. This has been a matter of considerable frustration as I believe that we have a duty to fully document matters, warts and all, and that Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy prohibits such whitewashing. But there are two factions to contend with. First, Wikipedians who strongly believe in protecting living persons at all costs. This is a noble goal, but they take it too far, seeking to "protect" people by fighting the documentation of their own words and actions. And second, political ideologues who seek to whitewash political articles of anything negative or "controversial" and have learned to successfully game Wikipedia policies. Unfortunately, I don't see things changing in the near future. Gamaliel (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
edit- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
DYK for Jane Rice
editOn 2 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jane Rice, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that science fiction and horror author Jane Rice had been a professional author for over fifty years before the publication of her first book, The Sixth Dog? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Jane Rice.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Babette Rosmond
editOn 3 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Babette Rosmond, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that author Babette Rosmond (1921–97) was an important early advocate against traditional treatments for breast cancer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Babette Rosmond.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Pauline Ashwell
editOn 3 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pauline Ashwell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that while Pauline Ashwell was nominated for a Hugo Award for Best New Author in 1958, her first story was actually published in 1942 when she was only fourteen years old? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Pauline Ashwell.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
You're awesome
editThat's it, basically. Just having a good time reading your incredibly diplomatic responses to Rodchen's various attempts to make Wikipedia more "politically balanced" by deleting massive chunks of cited, sourced facts and wanted to tell you I like your style, dude. Osiriscorleone (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have to warn you, though, I tend to balance it out by occasionally flying off the handle. Gamaliel (talk) 04:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
DYK for George Crile, Jr.
editOn 4 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Crile, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that surgeon George Crile, Jr. was instrumental in changing how breast cancer is treated by doctors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/George Crile, Jr..You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Márquez quotation
editHello from 75.27.41.134 !
In The Fragrance of Guava, a collection of conversations between Gabriel García Márquez and Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza, first published in 1982, Márquez describes Neruda as "the greatest poet of the 20th century — in any language." That is the original source of that statement, which has been quoted, unsourced, by the Washington Post, by All Things Considered on NPR, and most recently, in the New Directions paperback edition of Love Poems. But how exactly to cite that original source in a Wikipedia article, I will leave to you, the established editor.
¡ Buena suerte from 75.27.41.134 ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.41.134 (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- ¡Gracias! I'll add it to the article right away. Gamaliel (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- ¡ Soy una persona rigorista ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.41.134 (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Republican party edit war
editYou appear to be WP:edit-warring at Republican Party (United States) over something that is the subject of ongoing debate, please stop and take your position to the talk page instead. Metal.lunchbox (talk) 03:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
edit- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
DYK for Ralph Delahaye Paine
editOn 9 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ralph Delahaye Paine, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that William Randolph Hearst dispatched a "damn fool" to deliver a gold and diamond encrusted sword to Cuban independence leader Máximo Gómez? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Ralph Delahaye Paine.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Shearwater DYK nom
editI think I've answered your questions at Template talk:Did you know/Shearwater (schooner). Thanks for getting back to me so quickly, and if I can answer any other questions, please let me know. And, yes, Citation # 1, is not the best way to do things, but finding a better way that everybody at Wikiproject:NRHP can agree on is quite difficult. Smallbones (talk) 21:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThanks for finding the photo and helping with the Schlechten photographers article. Montanabw(talk) 19:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
EEP!
editCheck out [1] I think the Museum of the Rockies has copyrighted the image you used of Albert Schlechten (damn!) Montanabw(talk) 22:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, they can try copyrighting it, but legally it's been pretty much established that anything before 1923 is fair game. Gamaliel (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Just to be safe, I put in a fair use rationale and I also requested deletion from Commons. We won't be able to use it at DYK, but we can keep it in the article (all of which sucks, but I've fought and lost some of these, so not worth the fight, IMHO, though if you want to push the issue, I'll step back and eat popcorn while watching (grin). I reuploaded it here as File:Albert Schlechten1.jpg. What the problem is here is, I think, that the image itself may not have been published prior to 1923, or if it was, the Schlechten family kept the copyright until they sold the image to the Museum. If we could prove it was in a book prior to 1923 or published on a postcard, etc., I'd agree with you, but it may have been sitting in Chris's attic for 30 years, for all we know. I have to say that I am VERY grateful for your help and support on the article, that's for sure. With all the other wiki-drama in my wiki-life at the moment, this was a breath of fresh (mountain) air! Montanabw(talk) 23:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that didn't even occur to me. This is why I'm not a lawyer, I guess. Thanks for noticing and correcting my error. If it was indeed unpublished, according to this, it's not public domain until 2031. I don't see much benefit in fighting the matter as long as we can keep some kind of picture in the article itself under fair use. It's a wonderful photo and it would be a shame if we were unable to use it. Gamaliel (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- I did do the whole fair use thing, then someone else went and deleted it. What a pain in the butt. See [2] I asked them to please restore the fair use version, but oh well. That cornell site is cool! Montanabw(talk) 20:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- The same guy who deleted the one you uploaded here also removed the deletion request you added to my commons upload. So I guess we can just use the commons pic. Gamaliel (talk) 20:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, for now, until someone starts screaming about copyright violations (which would be sure to happen if the photo showed up on the main page in a DYK). Sigh. But it could be years. I gave it my shot. Thanks anyway for finding it and recommending its use! Montanabw(talk) 21:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Joe Wilson undo
editI see your point about CNS not being the most reliable source. I found this this press release from HHS which verifies the part of the claim that Affordable Care Act fund are expanding community health centers, and code § 51c.303 (v) 3 which verifies the statement that "that health centers are required to provide primary health care to all residents of the health center's service area". (I found the code section via a hrsa.gov page.) These links are both official government sites. Would adding these references sufficiently document the edit?
209.159.37.194 (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- I do not believe he is correct as the article states that "HR 3200 expressly excludes undocumented aliens". Neither of these sources mentions Wilson and we can't assemble a defense of Wilson or any other person from primary sources. See Wikipedia:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material_that_advances_a_position. Gamaliel (talk) 22:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, from what I can find HR 3200 does indeed exclude undocumented aliens from the Health Insurance Exchanges, the Insurance Premium Credits, and Medicaid/CHIP. I do not believe there is a general clause that covers all funds in general. It may also be that the law does include that, but there is no specific provision to require an immigration status check in these clinics or otherwise enforce it. Certainly the President may have believed the provisions were sufficient, even if they're not, to keep funds from going to illegals, so it wouldn't have been a "lie" but a mistake. That's why I put my addition on the "reflected his view" part. Anyway, I read your link about Synthesis of published materials and will drop the subject until/unless a more reliable source is found.
DYK nom for Lewis A. Lapham
editHi Gamaliel, I have reviewed your nomination for Lewis A. Lapham at Template talk:Did you know/Lewis A. Lapham and there are still some issues. Could you take a look at my comments at the nomination page and reply there? (BTW, I found an image that could be used to illustrate the article with a Non-free biog pic license [image is from Golf Digest]) If you get OTRS permission from the owner of the blog, this appears to be a childhood picture of the subject (blog here) Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's also a headshot at Yale, but I didn't use it because it was post-1923. But the golfing pic is a good idea, and it shows him and his father, so I'll upload that one. Gamaliel (talk) 19:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
edit- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
DYK for Lewis A. Lapham
editOn 16 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lewis A. Lapham, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when he was 20, shipping executive Lewis A. Lapham played a foursome with golf champions Bobby Jones and Francis Ouimet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Lewis A. Lapham.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Thomas F. Darcy
editOn 17 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thomas F. Darcy, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pulitzer Prize-winner Thomas F. Darcy drew a political cartoon featuring an L-shaped coffin and the caption "Good news, we've turned the corner in Vietnam!"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas F. Darcy.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for William A. Caldwell
editOn 19 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William A. Caldwell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pulitzer winner William A. Caldwell wrote approximately 12,000 editorial columns, each exactly 85 lines long, six per week for 41 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/William A. Caldwell.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Vineyard Gazette DYK
editPlease see my comment at the review page [3]. Basically I'm having trouble finding the info that it is the only paid subscription newspaper. I'm not doubting that it's true but can't find it in the source.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
DYK for E.R. Shipp
editOn 21 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article E.R. Shipp, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the congregation of her church was outraged when E.R. Shipp criticized her pastor in print, but he led them in a standing ovation when she won the Pulitzer Prize? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/E.R. Shipp.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Obama Siena poll
editSorry, it looks like I stepped on your reversion of the deletion of this short paragraph. I didn't think I was in edit mode all that long; it didn't stop the undo operation and I didn't get any edit conflict warnings. I just changed the wording slightly – "found that" seemed a bit WTAish, like "reported", in context. It does seem to need a bit more clarity ("ranked 15th out of 43" ...what? Penmanship? Golfing skills?) but anything I can think of gets too wordy (and "top president" is questionable anyway – I read it as "best", but some might dispute that interpretation, especially with things like "luck" and "background" factored in. Fat&Happy (talk) 05:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, I didn't even notice. Don't have any issue with your improvements. Gamaliel (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Ok, what's 'talk' vs. 'discussion'?
editGamaliel,
I checked the 'discussion' page prior to reverting the change, and didn't see anything to support 'consensus'.
PoqVaUSA — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoqVaUSA (talk • contribs) 19:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
edit- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
DYK for Vineyard Gazette
editOn 24 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vineyard Gazette, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Vineyard Gazette, the only paid circulation newspaper on the island of Martha's Vineyard, was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of Hurricane Bob in 1991? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vineyard Gazette.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Nancy Lee Grahn birthdate/Gale publications
editHello, You might think Gale is 'undisputed' in terms of what they publish, but, I hate to tell you that I worked for a TV/Radio station for 10 years and routinely filled out request forms from them and other publishers asking for information on our producers, hosts, etc. The information is only as good as the person who supplies it, and if the production company or whomever is sent the request either wants certain information disseminated, or what they have is what's been given to them for many years, the 'error' intentional or not, is perpetuated. You should leave birth date information blank if you won't accept what I've supplied which shows 1956 as a birth date. I gave you a direct link to a yearbook for 1976 (it does not allow a direct link to individual pages so you have to either page through it or put a name in a search box) which shows she wasn't a part of that class. If Gale has '1958' but they don't list their source, you just don't question it because it's easier to toe the line that they are always 100% correct. I'm not quite sure how you expect a person to prove something that's not there. You can't prove a negative. If the 1974 yearbook ever comes online and it shows her in that graduating class, would you then accept that as proof? In the meantime - you should just not list a birth date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.148.108 (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- That's a fair point, but you don't have any real evidence disputing Gale. There are any number of reasons why she may be absent from a particular year book. Maybe she skipped or was held back a year. Maybe she was sick on picture day. The year book doesn't prove or disprove a particular birth date. Gamaliel (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Gale does not prove or disprove a particular birth date. They do not cite sources. As I've explained above, or, they could simply glean information off of the internet. If you apply logic to them, they can't and don't possibly fact-check the thousands of dates they have in there. If you want to apply a higher standard to them, I would say they would need to obtain a copy of a birth certificate for every person listed in there, that would be undisputed. As it stands you know that they don't, and they don't cite where they get their information from. If you apply logic to what you say about a yearbook, they do in fact list a person's name if there is no picture. If she was held back a year she would have been in the junior class and she was not. nor the sophomore nor freshman. She was quoted in articles as not wanting to reveal her age as it would be a detriment to females' success in Hollywood. So there is documented motive to make it a later birth date. yet, you choose to list it. I know and have seen sources which indicate it is 1956 (not 57, not 58, not 59. not 55 etc) and it is unbelievable to me that simply because you have a self-annointed cannot-possibly-be-wrong 'source' that you would list a date. You don't have any real evidence to to support Gale's date. As soon as classmates.com gets an older yearbook with her listing, I am going to post it with 'graduated from Niles North High School class of 1974'. You can then leave the birth date but it will look dubious and conflicting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.148.108 (talk) 02:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- None of that matters about Gale, what matters is two things: 1) Gale is generally a reliable and accurate source and 2) You have no sources disputing Gale. If you know of sources which cite a different birthdate, please produce them. A yearbook which does not mention her date of birth is not such a source. You can theorize that if she is or is not in a particular yearbook, that must mean something regarding her date of birth, but that is just conjecture and not a source. This isn't about Gale being infallible, this is about throwing out a perfectly good source based on conjecture. Gamaliel (talk) 04:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
I already did: http://www.intelius.com/results.php?ReportType=1&formname=name&qf=nancy&qmi=&qn=grahn&qcs=&focusfirst=1 And I get the response 'it's unreliable' and 'how do we even know which one refers to her'. Take your pick. They're all either 55 or older. The one in California that has the correct middle name is 55. This is not a common name.
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?ti=0&indiv=try&db=uspublicrecords3&h=68137885
[Private information redacted - G]
U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings
Description: The U.S. Public Records Index is a compilation of various public records spanning all 50 states in the United States from 1950 to 1993. Entries in this index may contain the following information: name, street or mailing address, telephone number, birth date or birth year.
However, none of this is deemed 'acceptable'. You may not want 'original research' but when it clearly conflicts with an old printed directory that doesn't list sources, and it is one-click accessible, you can't see the forest for the trees,as they say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.148.108 (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- So then if the yearbook isn't the issue, why bring it up at all? If the issue is the matter of these database searches, then don't sidetrack it with an unrelated issue. So now that we are talking about this, Wikipedia simply doesn't employ public records in this manner. We use secondary sources. And the world is a big place. What information do you have that the particular NLG you selected from the search results is the actress? Because she lives in California? It's a big state. To employ this source is to build a pile of conjectures and assumptions. Gamaliel (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Um - regardless of their accuracy, the phone numbers and address should likely be redacted from this page...Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right, I've redacted it. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 20:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Um - regardless of their accuracy, the phone numbers and address should likely be redacted from this page...Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
'We' are not sidetracked at all with this issue - it arose because 'ponyo' kept reverting the page to the other versions and calling then unreliable and the like. I surely wish that your 'experts' or 'editors' or whatever you are called would read the history here before making comments. They also need to become a lot more familiar with 'primary sources' before making judgments and comments regarding these. The method in which you are operating is archaic and is leading to inaccuracies. Your lack of understanding in how these 'primary sources' work, as well as the sources you actually use, Gale, is frustrating to put it mildly. I'm going to say it one more time - the 'grahn' @ the various LA-area address is the only Nancy Lee Grahn in that area. - it's an extremely uncommon name. Gale and the like are simply GIGO - if this wasn't so frustrating because I'm dealing with this I'd be thinking this was funny. In any case, I've put a link to a production, already listed on the Grahn page for years, dating 1973-1974. I certainly hope there's no issue with THAT because it's the theater company's web site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.148.108 (talk) 20:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I find myself occupied with other matters today so this will hopefully be my last comment on the matter. You were the one who brought up the yearbook here, not Ponyo, so you can't blame him or her for sidetracking a discussion you started. I'm sorry that you disagree with Wikipedia's prohibition on original research and preference for secondary sources, but these matters are really outside the scope of this individual article. Perhaps you should visit the Village Pump and campaign for policy changes. Gamaliel (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
No, Ponyo was being less than detailed about the reasons for continually reverting the text, dismissing my sources, and the yearbook was an ADDITION to the information already presented; not a sidetrack (BTW I will post links or pics when the 73, 74 yearbooks become available - take them down or not, they are infinitely more accurate than an outdated, non-referenced, directory). I can't help it if you didn't read the original exchange. 'Preferences for secondary sources' should not be used at all if in a look at original sources they are proven to be wrong. Birth dates don't 'need' to be in this article and it is frustrating that you chose to re-insert it - it's simply a wrong date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.148.108 (talk) 00:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Emails to Debbie Wasserman Schultz
editI don't understand how this section is relevant on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)
I'm kinda new to this whole thing but it seems to me like this section violates: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER; WP:INDISCRIMINATE; WP:NPOV
This is a minor quarrel between two politicians. If every one of these was to be put on wikipedia, the site would be filled with minor quarrels.
Or am I missing something?
Thank you for your time, I know you're busy DaffyBridge (talk) 17:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to keep bugging you but there is one more caveat. The guy who keeps adding these minor quarrels (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ktr101) has "Very liberal" as his political status. I don't see how this is a neutral point of view.
Thanks again DaffyBridge (talk) 18:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I fail to see how that makes a difference. Should only conservatives be able to edit this article? Gamaliel (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Of course not. It's just that its a very minor story and (imho) Ktr101 has an agenda. I don't see why it should be included in the page (see first message). If every one of these minor quarrels were to be included in every politicians wiki, there would be no room for substance. I can find 10 stories just like this, but I don't think any should be on wikipedia. Also, on the discussion page, 3 other people thought this was WP:NOTNEWS and Ktr101 was the only one who continued to put it back on the page. Thats why I mention his politics. (FWIW, I have no real opinion about whether the information should be included or not) DaffyBridge (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again, but you still haven't answered my question. DaffyBridge (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- DaffyBridge is relatively new to Wikipedia and very interested in doing a good job with editing and understanding the workings of WP. Toward that end, DaffyBridge contacted me about the revisions to the article. I, too, am now curious about why the edit was reverted with only, "disagree" in the edit summary. Consensus on the discussion page seems to favor deletion of the material yet, you chose to revert the edit. Are there reasons you would like to share on the discussion page? I think it would help editors out if they understood your reasoning. Cheers! :) Wikipelli Talk 22:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to all, but I've found myself in the middle of a serious matter today (see WP:ANI) so I'll have to stop by this article and discuss this matter in depth at another time. Gamaliel (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Any chance you can give it a look? DaffyBridge (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on the subject? I'm inclined to remove the material, but, out of courtesy, I'm wondering what your thoughts are ... Wikipelli Talk 22:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to keep bugging you about this, but I still haven't heard back. I don't see how this content is encyclopedic. It seems like WP:NOTNEWS to me. DaffyBridge (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on the subject? I'm inclined to remove the material, but, out of courtesy, I'm wondering what your thoughts are ... Wikipelli Talk 22:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Any chance you can give it a look? DaffyBridge (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
removing edit summary
editThis isn't really germane to the discussion at ANI, which I've just begun looking into, so I'm mentioning it here. The revision deletion tool was probably a better option here, instead of deleting the entire article and restoring it without that edit summary. That way only the edit summary is removed, transparency is greater, and review of those actions by other admins is easier. Not that a big of a deal, just thought I'd mention it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of at tool (or I'd forgotten about it), but I will definitely use this next time this situation comes up. Thank you! Gamaliel (talk) 22:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Purging links for viewpoint on articles about people of that viewpoint
editRe your zealous link removals eg [4] as "rm dubious conspiracy/attack websites": Oh come now. The top two links you removed are transcripts of Garrison's own words at his most famous trial. Seems relevant to me. And wouldn't anything sympathetic towards the subject of the article by nature have to be from the "Conspiracy" viewpoint? -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- The text can be found at any number of websites, I imagine. There's no need to link to a ridiculous attack website like prouty.org. Gamaliel (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Some context to explain why I've labeled it such. Gamaliel (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. If you can find the text of Garrison's remarks at other sites you find less objectionable, I encourage you to add them to the article as substitutes. As I mentioned at the above link, I disagree with your removing any link to prouty . org from the Fletcher Prouty article. I still don't understand why you call it "a ridiculous attack website" and feel the need to blacklist it from your comments, and a quick skim of that website doesn't seem to support your characterization. That's of course quite a different issue from whether the opinions Prouty states are "crackpot". I'm not sure how we can aspire to informative NPOV in articles about people whose notability is heavily connected to their fringe opinions while censoring what those opinions are according to the subject's own words. Sheesh, Wikipedia has links to the text of "The Turner Diaries" and "Mein Kampf" -- how is Prouty somehow in a very much worse separate category? BTW -- I'm glad to see you found a nice use for my cupcake chicken photo :-) Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 23:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- If it were Prouty's own website, I would agree. But it's not Prouty, Prouty is dead and some other guy is using his name for his own purposes and to libel a number of living people, including myself. So if you followed the link I provided above I'm not sure why you are confused as to why I label it "a ridiculous attack website". It's because it's a cesspool of cranks who attack people. And thanks for the photo, it's one of my favorite pics created by Wikipedians. Gamaliel (talk) 23:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
edit- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
Re:Roberto Arango
editHi Gamaliel, it is nice to hear from you. I will try to find out his date of birth, but since the situation is such a huge political embarassment to his party and the people of Puerto Rico, I don't know if anyone will be willing to say anything about him. The ironic thing is that, according to what I have been told, this person who had such an influential position in the government of Puerto Rico and who with his acts embarassed Puerto Rico and it's people before the world, is not even Puerto Rican. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Here is one observation. If I find out his date-of-birth and post it, some one will come along and post a "citation needed" and maybe even delete or revert it as "original research". What do you think about my observation? Tony the Marine (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. If it's not published somewhere like a Senate Directory, then we should keep it out for that reason. Gamaliel (talk) 17:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Willis Conover
editFirst, this isn't a criticism or a complaint, just a matter of curiosity on my part. I had noticed the photo of Willis Conover on your user page along with your caption. The caption made me believe that there was something controversial that he was known for, but after reading the article about him (and other sources), I didn't see that he was a controversial figure. Is there something you were alluding to that should be included in the article about him? Thanks. --rogerd (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- And I just happened to notice this section heading in my watchlist -- now I'm curious too! (My Dad was a newsman for the Voice of America, so Willis Conover was a steady presence in my musical upbringing.) --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- I wish I had an interesting story to justify everyone's curiosity, but there's not much to it. To me, in this picture Conover is the epitome of suave jazz cool, and I thought it would be amusing to juxtapose that with contemporary bravado in the form of rap lyrics. Gamaliel (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I am an old fart, so I am not up to speed on rap. --rogerd (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- I wish I had an interesting story to justify everyone's curiosity, but there's not much to it. To me, in this picture Conover is the epitome of suave jazz cool, and I thought it would be amusing to juxtapose that with contemporary bravado in the form of rap lyrics. Gamaliel (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Michael Moore
editWould you be so kind to explain (here) why you removed Peter Schweizer's book Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy? I'm not a big fan of using sources like Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot and Other Observations and Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man but I'm not sure my personal displeasure excludes them from consideration. Wikispan (talk) 22:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Tetrabiblos
editJust a note to let you know that I think I've addressed your concerns regarding the DYK nomination of Tetrabiblos; left a comment at the nomination page as well. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, I've left a big green checkmark on the nomination page. Gamaliel (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for John Martin's Book
editOn 4 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Martin's Book, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the early 20th-century John Martin's Book was called the "most entertaining magazine" aimed at young children in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Martin's Book.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
edit- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
DYK for Clare Turlay Newberry
editOn 6 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clare Turlay Newberry, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when children's book illustrator Clare Turlay Newberry purchased a $500 ocelot for a live drawing model, The New York Times headline read "Still A Lot For Ocelot"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clare Turlay Newberry.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
edit- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
Paul Krugman talk page
editThere are a lot of comments on there that are more forum-like than mine, including critiques of George Bush and the Wall Street Journal. Surprisingly, you left those comments in place. Please don't edit talk pages so that they reflect your own political beliefs.--AntigrandiosËTalk 18:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- I was more concerned with the BLP violation. A forum-like comment I probably won't remove just for that; a forum-like comment that solely exists to attack the subject of the article I will always remove. If there are other forum-like comments you feel that should also be removed, feel free to point them out and I will remove them as well. I have removed your comment a second time. If you wish it to remain, please point out how it contributes to the improvement of the Wikipedia article or seek a dissenting opinion on the BLP noticeboard. Gamaliel (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
As I said, there are comments about Dumble U and the WSJ that can be found easily, but you convinced me. Can't really argue with any of your points.--AntigrandiosËTalk 02:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Threads missing after move
editHey Gamaliel. thanks for the re-name on Ali Sina (activist). However, I noticed that the old contents of the talk page didn't make into the new article's talk. How does one rescue the old comments? Thanks, The Interior (Talk) 20:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't follow you. It looks like everything is intact at Talk:Ali Sina (activist). Gamaliel (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I can't link it, as I can't find the old page, but the discussion page I was looking at yesterday had a very long and recent thread regarding the content. I'll dig around. The Interior (Talk) 20:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Can't find it, but unless I was hallucinating yesterday, something must have been lost in the move. The Interior (Talk) 20:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I checked the page histories of all the talk pages that are now redirects and also looked for any deleted edits. I couldn't find anything and there would be a record in the deletion history if there were edits deleted as a result of the move or for any other reason. Perhaps this discussion was on a different page? Gamaliel (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Can't find it, but unless I was hallucinating yesterday, something must have been lost in the move. The Interior (Talk) 20:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I can't link it, as I can't find the old page, but the discussion page I was looking at yesterday had a very long and recent thread regarding the content. I'll dig around. The Interior (Talk) 20:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
My sincere apologies, Gamaliel. I was watching two pages to do with similar content, and it was the other I was thinking about. Sorry for sending you on a wild goose chase. The Interior (Talk) 22:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, no problem. It was easy to check. Gamaliel (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Gamaliel,
I'm not going to revert your recent edit because I don't think that material belongs in the article's lead. However, material in the lead doesn't need to be referenced if it is reliably referenced later in the body of the article. As of now, the New York Times, The Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post have all criticized this book quite harshly, all on the sort of grounds that ought to disqualify it as a reliable source here. See my comments on the McGinness article's talk page, as well as on the Sarah Palin talk page. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I tend to agree, but I also think it's best to cite in the lead when there's controversial material involving a BLP. My objection was mostly to the weasly-ness of the wording, as well as UNDUE, of course. Gamaliel (talk) 04:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Then we do agree, and I take your point about contentious material in the lead. So I will move on by saying, best regards to you this evening (or whatever time of day it is where you live). Thanks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Robin de la Condamine
edit
On 18 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robin de la Condamine, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that William Butler Yeats loathed Robin de la Condamine's performance in his The Shadowy Waters, but could not fire him because all the actors were working for free? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robin de la Condamine.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Martin Hosking bio page
editHello - I am trying to edit the Martin Hosking bio page to make it more closely adhere to the Wiki guidelines on bio's of living individuals. I am adding some information to his earlier career (I dont see why this would keep being removed) and I am removing the detailed information about the controversy RedBubble had with regards to displaying a particular artists work. This information is related to RedBubble the company and it does not seem entirely relevant that it is on Hoskings bio page - unless that is the norm for all CEO's profiled on Wikipedia. And it is presented in a biased manner that is outdated. I would appreciate constructive feedback rather than having this perspective summarily removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriaboedshaw (talk • contribs) 17:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
edit- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
File:Frwlpenguin.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frwlpenguin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
blpn - Paul Krugman
editWikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Paul_Krugman (2) - hi, an edit of yours has been mentioned in this report at the BLP noticeboard, thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. Gamaliel (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 04:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Commander (Ping Me) 04:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Back in 2005, you contributed to the deletion discussion of this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft Beer Party. I believe consensus has changed since then and this article is no longer notable by our guidelines. I have renominated the article for deletion, and your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft Beer Party (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
edit
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
edit
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Neighbours - long-running
editHi. Instead of edit warring over the inclusion of "long-running" on the Neighbours page, please can you comment on this thread that I created with the intention of preventing such warring? Thank you. Absconded Northerner (talk) 06:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thought the anon's changes were controversial, as they were on many other articles. If the editors there agree with the anon, I have no problem with that. Gamaliel (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Drnopenguin.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Drnopenguin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Goldfingerpenguin.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Goldfingerpenguin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
edit
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Question
editHi. I am Jivesh. I saw the information you added to "Say My Name". Is "Single Ladies" on that list? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 04:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- I should be through the rest of the list today, so we'll see. Gamaliel (talk) 18:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Do let me know when you finish. By the way, are you a fan of Beyonce? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just looked at the whole list and "Single Ladies" doesn't appear to be on it. Gamaliel (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- And any other song by Beyonce? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just looked at the whole list and "Single Ladies" doesn't appear to be on it. Gamaliel (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Mr. Excitement!
editHey Gamaliel, I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Mr. Excitement! in the New Articles list-- The layout of the article makes it very clear. Kind regards and happy editing! Amy Z (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Velino Herrera
edit
On 17 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Velino Herrera, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that painter Velino Herrera was ostracized by Pueblo elders for depicting sacred Native American ceremonies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Velino Herrera.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 00:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
edit
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
Consensus of the Heroes in Hell Merge - Did it include all of the Books and Stories?
editAccording to my memory during the Lawyers in Hell AfD discussion about merging the Heroes in Hell articles into one large article, it was decided ALL the articles were to be merged. No mention was made of leaving any of the articles separate.
When I went to merge the one remaining article, one editor got really upset saying that the merge discussion did not include this article, Gilgamesh in the Outback. I believe that the consensus was for all articles. The admin who is currently handling the dispute was not involved at the time, and needs to see a show of hands. If you have any opinion on the issue could you please make your opinion known at Talk:Gilgamesh in the Outback. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
PS: Had a cupcake. My wife went on a cupcake cooking binge at 1:00 AM (note that I'm complaining - they were good!)
Reply to your message about copyrighted images
editHi,
First, thanks for the time you give to this.
Just wanted to say that it was my first time editing in Wikipedia and I thought a pic from a wiki page will have met the guidelines. I read that you don't have a problem with any image as long as it meets Wikipedia's guidelines. I'll see if I can come up with one.
Regards, Vali — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vali ace (talk • contribs) 05:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Why you changed and Put 'Prophet Muhammad(PBUH)', his unknown picture to the Google..the 100 boook listing in googlw wikipedia..?
Please stop uploading his unknown image of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH)..moreover..He was shown the statueless,Image less GOD..
Please dont do this..i kindly request it.,... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.100.53.252 (talk) 06:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not doing anything, I didn't put the picture there. If you want to replace it, discuss it at Talk:The 100. Gamaliel (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
editNew page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Gamaliel/Archive 17! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
edit- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
edit- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
Clinton L. Hare
editGamaliel, thanks for dropping that reference to the Yale Quarter-century record at Clinton L. Hare. I've used it to pull an image and significantly develop the article with a few tidbits from elsewhere. Take a look when you get a chance and let me know if you have any thoughts. Thanks again. Jweiss11 (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, no problem. I'm impressed with the expansion. If you can think of a good hook you should submit it to DYK. Gamaliel (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi
editHi, im new to wiki, i see your an admin, would like some guidance and to make new friends.
Tara1717 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC).
- Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy it here. If you have any questions please let me know. Gamaliel (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
edit- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
edit- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Talk:Pregnancy#RfC: Which photo should we use in the lead?
editYou are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pregnancy#RfC: Which photo should we use in the lead?. You participated in the previous RFC on the lead image, Talk:Pregnancy/Archive 4#Lead image RfC. Nil Einne (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Gamaliel
editAs you did a little work on this, I'm letting you know that the Tetrabiblos page has been submitted for a FA review request (see box on talk page). Cheers, -- Zac Δ talk! 11:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
edit- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
edit- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
DYK for George Arthur Plimpton
edit
On 30 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Arthur Plimpton, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that publisher and collector George Arthur Plimpton is the namesake of "one of the world's most famous mathematical artifacts"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Arthur Plimpton.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 22:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 16:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Re Real Estate (album)
editHi Gamaliel, first I apologise for unwarranted comment in Days (album) talk page. Thanks for expanding it. Both albums from Real Estate, have a warning in its infobox about moving reviews into article space. Could you visit and fix it? Being a newbie, I don't want to mess code and screw things round. Thanks.--DR998 (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
edit- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
edit- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
Bare URLS
editHello. I've noticed some of the citations you added for Strange Mercy and w h o k i l l are bare URLS. I just thought I should let you know. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 21:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll use that ref you formatted on Strange Mercy for future edits. Gamaliel (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
edit- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
edit- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
edit
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
edit- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
Orphaned non-free image File:Madmenflight1.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Madmenflight1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
edit
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
edit- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
edit- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
edit- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
MSU Interview
editDear Gamaliel,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
FYI - Courtesy Notification
editAs I was intent on changing my position to a simple Keep in your Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kerry VVAW controversy petition, I have asked the closing admin to consider re-opening the AfD to accommodate that position change. JakeInJoisey (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
edit- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
Library catalog
editThanks. Could you copy this over to my new post at WP:RSN where I moved this when I realised the RS issues needed to be solved first? Dougweller (talk) 17:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, missed the note that the discussion was moving to a different board. Maybe the BLPN discussion should be closed? Gamaliel (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
edit- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
'A cover up'
editI'd read your comment regarding VUW being engaged in 'a cover up' as irony. Given that this has now been copied to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Catalog_entry_withdrawn and seems to have been taken literally (by guess who ;-) ), could you please clarify this? AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Facepalm Oh, dear lord, how could anyone take that seriously? At least now I think we have definitve proof that we are being trolled. Gamaliel (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Frank Noel
edit
On 25 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Frank Noel, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pulitzer-winning photographer Frank Noel survived five days in a lifeboat after his ship was torpedoed, three years in communist prison camps, and the King David Hotel bombing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frank Noel.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Earle Bunker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
edit- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
edit- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
Steven Landsburg
editSteven Landsburg page - I see that 24.93.31.196 has modified a direct quote I inserted to make it look more favorable to Landsburg. And when I went to 24.93.31.196's talk page, I see that you are dealing with a similar situation. I looked 24.93.31.196 up, and his only edits to Wikipedia have been in the last few days to this article. That IP address is in Rochester. Hmmm :-) Trudyjh (talk) 00:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting.... Usually these types of things die down in a few days once the anon realizes that his/her changes won't stick. We'll just have to keep an eye on the article. Gamaliel (talk) 04:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
edit- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
edit- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
I happened to be reading about my mother, the author Babette Rosmond this morning, and was rather flummoxed to see that you mention she had been married to the science fiction writer Leonard Lake before her marriage to my father, Henry Stone (he had no middle initial J by the way). You know a great deal more about Mom that either my brother Jim or I do. Remarkable. How do you know so much and more importantly, how in the world would you know that she had been married to Mr. Lake? Fascinating. Totally fascinating.
Thanks for your help. Really appreciate it. Yours, Gene Stone
(See my own entry, or check out www.genestone.com. I followed in my mother's writerly footsteps. I wonder, if indeed she was married to Leonard Lake, if they had any children) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.5.251 (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. The information about Leonard Lake (as well as the middle initial J) comes from the book Partners in Wonder: Women and the Birth of Science Fiction 1926–1965 by Professor Eric Davin of the University of Pittsburgh. I read Professor Davin's book last year so I don't recall what his source was (if he offered any) for this information. You might want to contact Professor Davin to find out where he got this information or get him to correct the errors in his book. I found a web page which has contact information for him. Please let me know the result of your conversation with Professor Davin so we can update the article accordingly. Thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
edit- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
edit- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
Dispute resolution survey
editDispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Gamaliel. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 22:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
edit- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
reverted
editThere is no personal attack in this diff - I have reverted your removal - Youreallycan 21:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Replied at User talk:Youreallycan. Gamaliel (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Richard F. Cebull
editPlease see WP:NPA. You don't get to use the talk page to slander other editors. If you have complaints about other editors, please word them in a civil manner and/or bring them to the appropriate noticeboard. If you persist in reinserting personal attacks on that talk page, you will be blocked. Gamaliel (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
I just read the notice on the top of this page. You have done a great deal of hard work on this project but you also have a long history of overreacting and lashing out in an uncivil manner. I know you are a reasonable person when you are doing the former, and that's the person I'd prefer to deal with. If you are willing to be reasonable, I suggest we both take the rest of the day off from the article and revisit this when tempers have cooled. Gamaliel (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- - Its not a personal attack - you deserved a fish and you were edit warring -you already had a edit warring template and now you continue on the talkpage - please stop -Youreallycan 21:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it looks like you are determined to be unreasonable. I've blocked you for an hour so you can reconsider your decision to keep this uncivil. In that time I won't edit the article either. I don't understand why you think namecalling and accusations are appropriate behavior. Gamaliel (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
<not involved in dispute> Gamaliel, it appears when looking that you may be involved in a content dispute. I suggest that you unblock and carry it forward to ANI if you think that something more is needed. Please consider,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Extremely inappropriate block Gamaliel, I strongly advise you to unblock him ASAP, you are clearly involved and your block will no doubt make things even worse--Jac16888 Talk 21:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have no problem unblocking immediately if he stops reinserting personal attacks. That seems perfectly reasonable to me. He has a long history of personal attacks and incivility. My involvement is immaterial in clear cut cases of core policy violations. Gamaliel (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to give you a few minutes to undo a terribly bad decision by you. You are both involved and that was not a personal attack. Otherwise, I'll undo it myself and we'll talk at WP:ANI (where we will likely end up anyway).--v/r - TP 21:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I was about to say the exact same thing, A trout and a comment about being partisan are a long long way from a personal attack--Jac16888 Talk 21:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have no issue with the trout, I earn plenty of them. The namecalling I don't consider acceptable. Whatever happened to NPA and CIVIL? Gamaliel (talk) 21:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, the offending comment is him calling you partisan? i.e. either a fervent Obama supporter or a paramilitary force? Surely in an impressive 7 years as a sysop you have been called much much worse --Jac16888 Talk 22:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I've heard much much worse, including comments about sexual acts involving my parents. It wasn't the severity of the comment itself, but the fact that a editor feels he can libel myself and everyone else on the page as a way of opening the discussion while simultaneously complaining that 'he' is the one being attacked. That coupled with the fact that he's a long-term editor who feels that he can be completely uncivil with zero provocation with impunity, and that is pretty much every frustrating thing about Wikipedia rolled into one single person. Gamaliel (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- If you don't mind some friendly advice, why not just leave it alone? Unwatch Richard F. Cebull, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and User talk:Youreallycan and forget about it for a while, there are plenty of other people aware of it now, the article won't fall apart without you :D. Go find something different to do, try and find something to remind you how enjoyable wikipedia can be, you could whack some trolls, do some gnome work, if you're feeling brave I know of a particularly terrible article in dire need of assistance.--Jac16888 Talk 22:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not that brave, but I am off to greener wikipastures for now. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- If you don't mind some friendly advice, why not just leave it alone? Unwatch Richard F. Cebull, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and User talk:Youreallycan and forget about it for a while, there are plenty of other people aware of it now, the article won't fall apart without you :D. Go find something different to do, try and find something to remind you how enjoyable wikipedia can be, you could whack some trolls, do some gnome work, if you're feeling brave I know of a particularly terrible article in dire need of assistance.--Jac16888 Talk 22:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I've heard much much worse, including comments about sexual acts involving my parents. It wasn't the severity of the comment itself, but the fact that a editor feels he can libel myself and everyone else on the page as a way of opening the discussion while simultaneously complaining that 'he' is the one being attacked. That coupled with the fact that he's a long-term editor who feels that he can be completely uncivil with zero provocation with impunity, and that is pretty much every frustrating thing about Wikipedia rolled into one single person. Gamaliel (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, the offending comment is him calling you partisan? i.e. either a fervent Obama supporter or a paramilitary force? Surely in an impressive 7 years as a sysop you have been called much much worse --Jac16888 Talk 22:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have no issue with the trout, I earn plenty of them. The namecalling I don't consider acceptable. Whatever happened to NPA and CIVIL? Gamaliel (talk) 21:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I was about to say the exact same thing, A trout and a comment about being partisan are a long long way from a personal attack--Jac16888 Talk 21:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)I would say it's not really immaterial. Not only would any involvement cloud your judgement, but it also needs to be seen to be uninvolved. There are rare cases that involved admins can take action, very rare. This wasn't one, per WP:INVOLVED WormTT · (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Well, it's pretty clear what the consensus here is, and I will unblock. I won't stand for the namecalling, however, and I don't think it's unreasonable to demand that the attacks directed at myself and others remain deleted from the page, however minor the editors here feel those attacks may be. Also, thanks to everyone here for your level-headed input. Gamaliel (talk) 21:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to give you a few minutes to undo a terribly bad decision by you. You are both involved and that was not a personal attack. Otherwise, I'll undo it myself and we'll talk at WP:ANI (where we will likely end up anyway).--v/r - TP 21:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have no problem unblocking immediately if he stops reinserting personal attacks. That seems perfectly reasonable to me. He has a long history of personal attacks and incivility. My involvement is immaterial in clear cut cases of core policy violations. Gamaliel (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- NPA and CIVIL are still in effect, but you need to find someone disassociated with the issue to determine if they really are personal attacks. Let's be honest, have you never said anything that was taken out of context or in a way you didn't intend. Also, I'm not lenient on civility violations at all, but you're really letting the minor of all minor comments get to you. If it is a civility issue, it only barely scratches the surface and is on the level of what is to be expected with disagreements. Besides, trouts are usually used in a humorous way with someone you respect. --v/r - TP 21:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- As I told YRC, I have a great deal of respect for his hard work in the past, but he is hardly expressing any respect for any other editor on that page. I'd see the trout with respect had it not been coupled with accusations and namecalling. Gamaliel (talk) 22:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- NPA and CIVIL are still in effect, but you need to find someone disassociated with the issue to determine if they really are personal attacks. Let's be honest, have you never said anything that was taken out of context or in a way you didn't intend. Also, I'm not lenient on civility violations at all, but you're really letting the minor of all minor comments get to you. If it is a civility issue, it only barely scratches the surface and is on the level of what is to be expected with disagreements. Besides, trouts are usually used in a humorous way with someone you respect. --v/r - TP 21:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think you two just need to take some time apart. Now YRC is talking about an Arbcase which might be a little much for this. Just keep WP:INVOLVED in mind from now on. Also, this is inappropriate because now you're guilty of bad behavior too by issue an involved block. I think you both should just back off for a little while until tensions cool and then get together and just talk about what happened and why it escalated and try to understand each other.--v/r - TP 22:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, why was it inappropriate? I was trying to be polite and civil. Or was it the fact that I posted at all and not the content? I have no problem keeping away from him as long as he does the same. I am a firm believer in walking away from wikiproblems for a cooling off period. In fact, the block was a clumsy attempt to do that very thing, and my comment that you link to was an attempt to do that very thing you suggest in your last sentence. Gamaliel (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- It is only inappropriate because now your guilty of a wrong involving him to. So it's like if one of my kids pushed the other and the second kid hit the first and then said "Pushing is wrong". You see what I mean? Now, if it was "I'm sorry I hit you, but pushing me is wrong too" then that would've been different. My suggestion involves time to cool off for both of you. Even if you're ready to talk, he might not be.--v/r - TP 22:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Point taken. I won't initiate any further interaction with him. Gamaliel (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- It is only inappropriate because now your guilty of a wrong involving him to. So it's like if one of my kids pushed the other and the second kid hit the first and then said "Pushing is wrong". You see what I mean? Now, if it was "I'm sorry I hit you, but pushing me is wrong too" then that would've been different. My suggestion involves time to cool off for both of you. Even if you're ready to talk, he might not be.--v/r - TP 22:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, why was it inappropriate? I was trying to be polite and civil. Or was it the fact that I posted at all and not the content? I have no problem keeping away from him as long as he does the same. I am a firm believer in walking away from wikiproblems for a cooling off period. In fact, the block was a clumsy attempt to do that very thing, and my comment that you link to was an attempt to do that very thing you suggest in your last sentence. Gamaliel (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think you two just need to take some time apart. Now YRC is talking about an Arbcase which might be a little much for this. Just keep WP:INVOLVED in mind from now on. Also, this is inappropriate because now you're guilty of bad behavior too by issue an involved block. I think you both should just back off for a little while until tensions cool and then get together and just talk about what happened and why it escalated and try to understand each other.--v/r - TP 22:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
offer GF
editI am not a person that holds simple grudges from mistaken issues and I was quickly unblocked and moving forward am prepared to hold no bad feelings and leave the whole minor storm in a teacup in the past. - Regards - Youreallycan 22:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- That sounds good to me, and the feeling is mutual. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- You guys are awesome, perfect ending for this whole thing.--v/r - TP 22:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
DYK for William M. Gallagher
edit
On 12 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William M. Gallagher, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer William M. Gallagher once commandeered a police helicopter to cover a story? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William M. Gallagher.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
edit- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
editHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2012 Pulitzer Prize (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Moore, David Jackson, John Hill and David Wood
- Massoud Hossaini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to National Geographic
- Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Patrick Farrell
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
edit- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
Babette Rosmond
editHello again. My brother and I hired a private detective to look into the possibility that my mother was married to Leonard Lake. Here's what he has to say: "I can say without a doubt you're mother was NOT married to Leonard M. Lake. They were in a brief relationship that never went anywhere and became very good friends. Lake was married in May of 42', and courted and dated his wife for a little over two years. They met in 1939. So he was already involved in a relationship when they co-authored the story. There is absolutely no record in county, city or state that you're mother was ever married before your dad. " Would it be possible to correct the marriage mention? I've also passed this information on to Eric Leif Davin. Thanks, Gene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.5.251 (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
edit- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
edit- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
edit- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
edit- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
Hi you might want to protect Transpiration article and block 86.63.8.129.--thanks, Rich Peterson76.218.104.120 (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
edit- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
edit- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
edit- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
edit- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Non-free rationale for File:Proswell.jpeg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to File:Proswell.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
edit- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
Nomination of Albums considered the greatest ever for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albums considered the greatest ever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albums considered the greatest ever (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
edit- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
edit- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
Orphaned non-free image File:Moonraker (book cover).jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Moonraker (book cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mike Peel (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Lonesome1928.jpg)
editThanks for uploading File:Lonesome1928.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
edit- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
edit- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
edit- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
Notification of RFC/U concerning Youreallycan
editI'd like to notify you, as a previous blocking administrator, that I've initiated a Request for Comments/User concerning Youreallycan (talk · contribs). The RFC/U, which mentions your block, can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Youreallycan. Prioryman (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
edit- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
edit- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
The Signpost: 20 August 2012
edit- In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia
- Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.
- Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension
- WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
edit- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
edit- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
edit- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
edit- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
edit- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
edit- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
edit- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
edit- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
edit- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
edit- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Featured content: On the road again
Well done
editThis user helped promote Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul to good article status. |
You created the article, and now it's a GA. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
edit- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
edit- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
edit- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
edit- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
edit- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
edit- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
ITN
editKindly refrain from unilaterally adding content. There is a process at ITNC for these things and there is also an update requiement. Furhter when added a note needs to be places on ITNC. Youre always welcome to contribute and be a part of ITNC (dont recall seeing you tere)(Lihaas (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)).
- The page was updated and there was consensus on the discussion page. I fail to see anything unilateral here. Gamaliel (talk) 07:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
edit- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
edit- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
The article Rudolf Alexander Schröder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability.
No English reference.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Christopher Haun
edit
On 28 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christopher Haun, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that renowned antebellum potter Christopher Haun was executed for his participation in the East Tennessee bridge-burning conspiracy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Haun. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
(X! · talk) · @353 · 12:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
edit- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
edit- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
edit- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
Thanks!
editThanks for the kind words in reviewing my DYK submission! -- kosboot (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
DYK Nomination
editHello! Your submission of Elizabeth Jordan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 48th Street Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Chase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Elizabeth Jordan
edit
On 20 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elizabeth Jordan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that author Elizabeth Jordan edited the first two novels of Nobel Prize winner Sinclair Lewis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Jordan. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
For you're well-researched, well written new article on the 48th Street Theatre. Fantastic work!! oknazevad (talk) 14:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you! I had a lot of fun writing that article because so many different things happened there. Gamaliel (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
GA Thanks
editThis user helped promote Rahm Emanuel to good article status. |
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Rahm Emanuel, which has recently become a GA. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's been a while since I've worked on that article, it's good to know it's still being improved by capable hands. Gamaliel (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
edit- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
edit- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
re: RSN discussion
editI agree with you about your suggestion to merge to the list, but I've linked to two AFD's which were closed as "keep", and I suspect that merging them would result in an edit war. As for the Atlantium article, it was carefully guarded by a COI editor. The "ruler" of that entity was a very active editor here on Wikipedia, User:Gene Poole, who apparently stopped editing in 2011, after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactions between micronations was closed as "delete". Take a look at his contribs; he was a near-SPA with over 7,800 (still live) edits (and a whole bunch of deleted edits on related topics). Almost every time any type of discussion is initiated on a micronation-related article, that book gets mentioned, which is why I am trying to pin down a definitive answer. I don't want to eradicate micronations from Wikipedia, but I would like to reduce a substantial amount of the fanwanking which currently exists. List of micronations is better than it has been in the past; there is only one redlink, about 10 redirects, and only one "fictional micronation" (naturally, it's from Family Guy), but it's also been semi-protected for two years because of the constant stream of drivel which was dumped there before. Horologium (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sigh. It's an old story on Wikipedia. The passionate ideologues take control and the rest of us cede the articles to them, weary of the constant struggle. If this particular COI editor is currently inactive, perhaps now is the time to trim back some of the fancruft. I'll try an experiment with the Atlantium article and see what happens. Gamaliel (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)