Galtzerdiak, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Galtzerdiak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Meeting on the Isle of Pheasants (Laumosnier) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meeting on the Isle of Pheasants (Laumosnier) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeting on the Isle of Pheasants (Laumosnier) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marvellous Spider-Man 13:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

San Telmo Museum
added links pointing to Dominican, Basque region and San Sebastian
Recovery of San Juan de Puerto Rico by Governor Juan de Haro
added a link pointing to San Cristobal
The Conversion de Sant Paul (Maíno)
added a link pointing to José Vergara
The Hunt in Aranjuez
added a link pointing to Philip IV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Arantxa Iturbe edit

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Galtzerdiak, thanks for creating Arantxa Iturbe!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address the errors in English language. To avoid deletion, please provide more sources, and inline references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please slow down edit

Thank you for contributing articles; however, most of them contain a lot of errors that other people then have to fix. Please check out the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons standards to begin with. Deb (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

When creating new biographical articles, please do not put the place of birth between the brackets with dates of birth and death. This is contrary to the guidelines I referred you to above. Deb (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Galtzerdiak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Joxe Austin Arrieta) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Joxe Austin Arrieta, Galtzerdiak!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 3 issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of R. M. K. Sinha edit

 

The article R. M. K. Sinha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unconvincing Notability (people) or Notability (academics). Lacks reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 22:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Galtzerdiak

Thank you for creating Siobhan Heanue.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Siobhan Heanue. Note that other editors have questioned her notability, which requires evidence on not just her own publications, but reliable coverage ABOUT her work as a journalist. If this matter is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted. For pointers, see WP:JOURNALIST and WP:NBIO.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Siobhan Heanue for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siobhan Heanue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhan Heanue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply