Welcome! edit

Hello, Galaxiaad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 01:04, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks edit

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page before I got to it! --Richard0612 10:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

My revert to Shakira edit

Whoops, looks like I got a little trigger-happy there. This VandalProof thing is so fast, I had to disable tapping on my touchpad when I use it. Thanks for catching it. Dina 11:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Hello there, I'm just apologizing for my editing on the Constellation links. I should of understood and took time to read that this isn’t a place for advertising and I'll take that into consideration.

Yeh they are amazing bands, its great to try and get people together who love the same music. As much as I love Boards of Canada and other electronic artists for that matter I decided to keep with a theme of Constellation Record artists, but that might change in the future!

Again sorry for my mistake and thanks :)

-(Hexagonsun 21:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC))Reply

Humourous edit

I really liked "the grammar freak and the descriptivist linguist in me are constantly at war"! I might use that, though I'd never claim it as my own. --Guinnog 01:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! It's good to know others have the same problem. ;) --Galaxiaad 18:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Space Invader edit

I've seen it referred to as both Invader and Space Invader. He seems to sign himself as just Invader, but others refer to him more often Space Invader. I've no real preference over what the article is titled, except obviously for the fact I chose Space Invader. Fine by me unless anyone else objects. --duncan 22:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Elliott Smith edit

Thank you for your kind words! I hope we can get him on the front page someday! =) Phorque 19:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Thanks for your concerns. I think I'll just try to work things out directly with any interested editors as there are likely to be reasonably few of them, and working across a dozen talk pages at once is fairly inconvenient. I did take one of the largest of these categories that I could find, Category:Pages containing IPA, to categories for deletion to see what the consensus was on that matter. See [1] for some discussion on relevant issues. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For your kind congratulations. Let me know if there is ever anything I can do for you. I still do a bit of AWB/RETF work from time to time. --Guinnog 20:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Userboxtop template edit

I fixed the problem you mentioned. Pagrashtak 15:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tofurky/tofurkey edit

If a page links to a redirect, it's not necessary (or desirable) to edit that page just to change the wikilink. See Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken. I've mentioned on the Talk:Tofurky page that the redirect probably shouldn't be there anyway. -- JHunterJ 11:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I know. :/ I started doing it (when the move asked me to check for double redirects) and then realized maybe I shouldn't be, and continued partially just for consistency (heh), and partially because I was thinking tofurkey basically referred to Tofurky anyway, and so was a misspelling. (Though I did see the recipes, it still could be argued that those are imitating the Tofurky product — and besides, did people use the word "tofurkey" before that product, or is it a genericized trademark?) Looks like your comments on the talk page were made after I did the move. Anyway, now I believe you're right about the tofurkey thing and I think it was a good idea to separate the pages; I'm just trying to explain my reasoning so as to look a bit less foolish. :) Incidentally, Talk:Tofurky is still a redirect to Talk:Tofurkey. Though the comments there kind of pertain to both articles (really they pertain to the old Tofurkey), I assume the best thing to do would be just to remove the redirect. What do you think? --Galaxiaad 17:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oops on the derelict talk page redirect; yes, it should be removed (I'll do that momentarily). Turtle Island has trademarked only Tofurky, although they have both tofurky.com and tofurkey.com. tofurkey goes back in the news to 13 November 1996 (Hartford Courant), tofurky to 7 November 1995 (The Oregonian), both in reference to Turtle Island products, so (I speculate) there may have eventually been an issue with getting tofurkey trademarked. <shrug> -- JHunterJ 17:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Who? edit

In response to this message: I'm sorry; I have no idea who or what "AMK" is. ^^;  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 23:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

... oddly enough, I was on an anime chat on Napster years ago. That was around the time my laptop died, though, so I don't really have any logs to refer to; and Google does show someone around by the nick "AMKestrel", so I can't really say whether you're remembering me or not. ... um. Would there have been someone by the nom de share of "KhaosLady" on this chat?  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 03:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Baribari Value edit

Thank you for making this article into comprehensible English. I've edited it slightly and checked that it's consistent with the Japanese article. -- Grgcox 12:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

bash.org edit

response left on TALK:bash.org. /Blaxthos 22:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Philly meetup edit

Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask CComMack's talk page. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 16:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Philadelphia Meetup 3 edit

FYI ... Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 3 --evrik (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

percentages edit

do have any percentages of howmany kids use drugs illegaly

16:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)67.33.205.8 16:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

I do hope the reason you haven't got dozens of these already isn't that you hate the very idea of them! If so, just take it down. Best wishes, --Guinnog 05:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Announcement edit

Announcement
The "Help name my baby" Poll has closed :). Greta Annette was born 12/12/06. She weighs 6lbs 14oz and is 19inches long. Mother and baby are both doing fine. Thanks for all the suggestions!

To keep this slightly Wikipedia related I have started Adopt a State, so adopt your state article today!

Why Seth and not Greta? edit

Congratulations! Not important, but I'm wondering why you changed the made-up name in the example from "Fred" to "Seth" in the Philosophy of Mind article under Interaction Dualism? I'm a new Wikipedian so maybe there's a very good reason that I'm not aware of.

Thanks, MEL1967 04:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

AWB edit

I saw you took out skagerak from the spell checker. I got a message about awb spelling it wrong, and i thought about it, and it seems that the entry for spellcheck was just causing problems.

Thanks for taknig that out.

Bearingbreaker92 | Talk 18:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, no problem! --Galaxiaad 23:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smiley Award edit

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

 
For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 22:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

AutoWikiBrowser and Google Search edit

Hi Galaxiaad,

AutoWikiBrowser's Google Search function is working again. You'll have to download the newest version, but it's working now. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 01:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! --Galaxiaad 06:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Neuropsychosis <-> Psychoneurosis edit

The reference which James used was an old journal, named "California Medicine", which i actually have a print copy of; the neuropsychosis/psychoneurosis thing was one of those old phrases which were used but dropped somewhat later. The paper was printed in the 60's, so it's excusable that the name is interchangable.. still, i'll replace it, as there needs to be continuity in the message presented to the reader.   J O R D A N [talk ] 16:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, sorry -- i meant to change it. James.Spudeman 19:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signature edit

Hehe. I'm glad you like my signature. ^_^ -- R'son-W (speak to me/breathe) 08:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA for Hydroxyzine edit

Fancy putting it up for GA? James.Spudeman 18:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank-you edit

Just wanted to add to the chorus: your diagram is so cool. --Galaxiaad 08:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank-you for your kind comment :) --Thoric 23:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
 

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup

Sunday March 4, 2007

5pm
Independence Brew Pub

RSVP

3rr edit

As I explained on Billywhack's talk page, I have not even reached the 3rd revert. I reverted two times and then added the cn tag and readded it. 3RR pertains to repeated insertions of the same revert. I have reverted twice to one revert and then only once to another revert, these do not compromise 3RR. Also 3RR is about staying civil, which I have throughout this unlike Billywhack. Gdo01 04:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good work edit

On all your typo corrections, and thanks for the message you left while I was away. --Guinnog 20:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arturo Frei edit

Just to let you know that I've gone and deleted the text you left a note on User:Melromero's talk page about. If you find pages in other languages in the future, please feel free to leave us a note about them on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. -Yupik 07:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


WikiProject Philadelphia Invite edit

 

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
Sunday July 8, 2007

Time: 5:00 pm
Location: It will be in Center City, Philadelphia at 112 North 9th Street Philadelphia, PA 19107.
Tel: (215) 829-8939

RSVP

? edit

Richmond, California id like to make a request for comment in the 80 image section please. Cholga saYS THANKS!Cholga is a SUPERSTAR¡Talk2Cholga!Sexy Contribs 01:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Pennsylvania edit

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bupropion ownership, MAOIs edit

This also bothered me... see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles, and as for the MAOI bit, A and an. Regardless of what letter a word starts with, if it's *pronounced* with a vowel sound at the beginning ("em"), it takes "an". It could be argued that the abbreviation MAOI is only written shorthand, and that in reading it out loud one would actually say "a monoamine oxidase inhibitor", but I think most people would simply read the letters out, so it would take "an". --Galaxiaad 03:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


Dear Galaxiaad,
I re-read the guideline on the Ownership of articles, and I do not think that it applies to the situation with bupropion. Please check the article’s history. I always try to avoid reversals, even when the edits are questionable from my point of view, if they do not introduce factual mistakes or make the article significantly worse. Unfortunately, this was the case with about a half of the many edits Outriggs made. For example, Wikipedia guidelines encourage formal style of writing, and Outriggs replaced formal “because” by “so” and formal “approximately” by “roughly”.
I am sorry that the edit summary “Correcting outrigg's grammar, factual mistakes, colloquialism” bothered you. However, Wikipedia:No personal attacks guideline explicitly permits referring to other editors: “When there are disagreements about content, referring to other editors is not always a personal attack. A posting that says "Your statement about X is wrong because of information at Y", or "The paragraph you inserted into the article looks like original research", is not a personal attack. The appropriate response to such statements is to address the issues of content rather than to accuse the other person of violating this policy.” There no exception mentioned as applied to the edit summaries or the editor’s talk page headings.
My mistake was to reverse “an MAO” to “a MAO” since both forms are acceptable. You can find them both used in peer-reviewed and edited by professional editors journals. Americans appear to prefer “an MAO” while Europeans and Australians – “a MAO”. You read the word as “emeyo” while I read it as “meyo”, so it is just a tomahto – tomeito difference not worth the trouble. Since then I changed the article to uncontroversial “MAOIs”.
I would like to repeat that I will always appreciate your edits, and I hope in the future to solicit them, if you do not mind.
SincerelyPaul gene 19:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week edit

WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Drugs: Do not include detailed dosage and titration information. edit

Galaxiaad,

I would appreciate your comments on the topic of acceptability of dosage and titration information on the MEDMOS Talk page. Thank you Paul gene 01:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week edit

Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.

Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.

In other news:

  • The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.
  • Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Pharmacology Update edit

Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!

  • Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status.
  • Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template {{talkheader}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 05:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Philly meetup #5 edit

Please look at Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 5 and give your input about the next meet-up. Thank you.
This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot 21:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

phildelphia edit

A commons misspelling. Suggestions on how to get it fixed? --evrik (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC) P.S. How much longer are nyou in town?Reply

Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 5 edit

File:LOVE Park fountain.jpg

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
November 11, 2007

Time: 5:00 pm
Location: Buca Di Beppo, 258 South 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

RSVP


You have received this message because you are on the invite list, you may change your invite options via that link. BrownBot 22:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Reply

WikiProject Pharmacology Update edit

Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:

  • The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to Collaboration of the Month, based on current participation levels. It is also more likely that articles collaborated on for one month are more likely to achieve featured quality than articles worked on for only a week or two.

Dr. Cash 22:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article rename edit

On the basis of your talk page comment (and another voice and my own opinion) I went ahead and renamed encapsulation (pharmacology) to your suggestion capsule (pharmacy). I also tweaked pill (pharmacy) for consistency. I also updated about 30 links to the original title. MaxEnt (talk) 22:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

typo template edit

All user pages with the template {{User:Galaxiaad/typo}} are automatically put into the U section of Category:Wikipedians on the Typo Team because they are all starting with "User:". Can you fix this? I know nothing about how to create a template, but my guess is that this could be fixed by adding the attribute |{{PAGENAME}} to <includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedians on the Typo Team]]</includeonly>. Thanks, Warut (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Jinx.com edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jinx.com, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinx.com. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missing topics about pharmacy edit

Thank you - Skysmith (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sertraline edit

Galaxiaad, you have a good sense of style, and I wonder if you could take a look at sertraline. I would appreciate any corrections of style and grammar and any comments. Many thanks Paul Gene (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for the editing you have done. Do I take it that you do not see any major problems or other things I could fix? Paul Gene (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you again for the thoughtful comments - they helped to make the article better. Now. let them rip it at FAC. Paul Gene (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Here is for copyediting Sertraline, asking fine questions about the article and helping make it featured. Paul Gene (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to WikiProject Drug Policy edit

Galaxiaad - I saw your comments on the Drug injection page and wanted to invite you to join the new WikiProject Drug Policy. I think that your "H" userbox and interest in pharmacology would benefit the project, and hope to work with you both on it and the page first mentioned. Regards, Shamanchill (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's a House userbox, you know... ;) But I'll bite. Definitely an interest of mine... harm reduction more so than policy but yeah. --Galaxiaad (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know Hugh Laurie from writing the Gun Seller and from his days as Berty Wooster and Percy on the BBC. I didn't realize that the good Dr. had given you a script for that userbox... ;P Shamanchill (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of drum corps edit

AfD nomination of List of drum corps edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of drum corps, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of drum corps. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JimBurnell (talk) 20:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Might take a look edit

Hello. Just wondering if you would mind taking a look at a collaborative effort I'm trying to start. Any feedback or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! DxNate 13:30, 29 Apr 2024 User-Talk-Contribs

Typo Team edit

Hi, Galaxiaad. I'm considering moving the Wikipedia's Type Team main project site from "Wikipedia: Typo" to "Wikipedia: Typo Team". It seems to be the right thing to do. Since so many people use your typo team userbox I wanted to run the idea by you first. Jason Quinn (talk) 23:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Parafon Forte edit

--Cssiitcic (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:Cssiitcic/Templates/Alprazolam Message

Homatropine methylbromide edit

You changed that to redirect to Homatropine. "Just a salt of Homatropine". This is not true. It is not a salt, but the quaternary ammonium base "Methylhomatropine". It is a completely different drug from Homatropine, as it does not cross the blood-brain barries and has no central effects, only peripheral effects as a spasmolytic for e.g. the stomach of gall bladder. So this redirect is wrong. 70.137.151.84 (talk) 22:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bergamont edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bergamont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bergamont edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bergamont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!) edit

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kranky Records edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kranky Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 13:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your thoughts? edit

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Stanton (Politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Stanton (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Galaxiaad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Guillermo Dávila (Album Self-Titled) listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guillermo Dávila (Album Self-Titled). Since you had some involvement with the Guillermo Dávila (Album Self-Titled) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Galaxiaad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed edit

Hello Galaxiaad! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 22:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Galaxiaad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

"9 to 5 (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 9 to 5 (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#9 to 5 (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Revia (disambiguation) edit

 

The article Revia (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply