March 2009

edit

Convenience devocalization

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Convenience devocalization, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you wish to make major changes to this article, please seek consensus at Talk:Convenience devocalization. Whatever404 (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Convenience devocalization, you will be blocked from editing. If you wish to make major changes to this article, please seek consensus at the Talk page. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 19:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent changes to Convenience devocalization represent something of a departure from the established tone and content of the article; I have reverted them due to concerns about WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:V. If you would like to make changes to an article that other editors find problematic, an effective way to build consensus among your fellow editors is to visit the article Talk page, and to start a discussion about your concerns. Whatever404 (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I raised several concerns at the article Talk page (Talk:Convenience devocalization#Unsourced additions); you did not respond, and instead reinstated the changes, and more. As I had already challenged several of your additions as unsourced, when you reinstated some of them without sources, I reverted the set of changes entirely. I have added the (articleissues) template to indicate that there is a neutrality and accuracy dispute; anyone who visits the article will see the notification at the top of the page and be aware that the material is in dispute. I am asking, again, that you will refrain from edit warring, and please come to the article Talk page to discuss the situation. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 04:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Convenience devocalization, you will be blocked from editing. Check the references: the content which you have removed several times is indeed sourced. Whatever404 (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please sign your comments

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please review these policies

edit

Please review WP:CIVIL and especially WP:NPA. You are growing increasingly hostile and accusatory at Talk:Convenience devocalization. Personal attacks are prohibited on Wikipedia. WP:NPA is a policy which instructs us to "Comment on content, not on the contributor". If you are displeased with another editor's editing style, there are avenues available for dispute resolution, but all such avenues recommend that editors try to discuss the issue among themselves and try to work it out, first. Remaining civil goes a long way toward making that possible. Thanks. Whatever404 (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply