GailBev

This is GailBev's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Kamberov (January 29) edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read carefully the notability guidelines, then rewrite. Currently this has too much bragging, as well as vast sections which have no sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emmanuel Kamberov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello and thank you for your input. Here I provide evidence for coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. These include over 1300 reference citations of Dr. Kamberov's scientific work and achievements in peer reviewed scientific publications and international patents, referenced in three independent reputable sources: 1. Research Gate, 2. Science Direct, and 3. Google Scholar. In addition, I am providing a graph of the number of Dr. Kamberov's peer reviewed articles and international patent citations by year since 1997 (reproduced from Google Scholar online)

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Emmanuel-Kamberov-3/3

https://www.sciencedirect.com/author/55398769300/emmanuel-s-kamberov

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=PnXSrYoAAAAJ&hl=en#d=gsc_md_hist&t=1707242343195

I will add these references to the existing page and resubmit it. GailBev (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GailBev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Kamberov (February 7) edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately you did not read the criteria carefully. Being cited 1500 times or so (Google scholar has 2716) is not notable, particularly with an h-factor of only 24. If you want to see what obvious notability looks like, try David Kass (physician). The gap is too large.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emmanuel Kamberov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 03:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic