User talk:Gaffary/Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Piter.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 01:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Shimun Vrochek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shimun Vrochek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shimun Vrochek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the very tardy response. I have asked for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia to review the sourcing. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Piter.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 01:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Samotny Wędrowiec, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Samotny Wędrowiec! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Piter.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 07:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Piter.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Gaffary/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Gaffary/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Gaffary/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by JHUbal27 20:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piter

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Piter.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Metro: Last Light, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Please don't go against WP:CONSENSUS when editing. You might want to put a Polish game website here, but is not a notable reviewer. Thanks. Soetermans. T / C 22:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Gaffary. You have new messages at Soetermans's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Gaffary. You have new messages at Soetermans's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Kind regards, Afro-Eurasian (talk) 02:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vodka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tatanka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Absolwent (Polish vodka), version for export called "Graduate".jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Absolwent (Polish vodka), version for export called "Graduate".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Not sure how this is possible, so I object; my response has been posted at the link you provided. -- Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 00:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Here we go again... -- Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Żubrówka (100ml).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Żubrówka (100ml).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Żołądkowa Gorzka.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Żołądkowa Gorzka.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Soplica Wiśniowa.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soplica Wiśniowa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Krupnik Staropolski.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krupnik Staropolski.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Śliwowica Podbeskidzka.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Śliwowica Podbeskidzka.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Vodka Bottles

Duly updated. If you could check the Fair use rationales over, if you able to add the name of the manufacturers in the Owner fields it would be most appreciated. (BTW Don't buy Russian vodka at the present time..) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

I've added them where they are missing, though I'm not sure what should be done with the image where there are multiple bottles. And don't worry - I prefer Polish vodka anyway. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gaffary. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 00:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way crap is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which spam be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

But this is my own photo... --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

We don't need unfree bottle labels in the article Vodka as pre-1923 labels would serve the same purpose. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Ummm, no, they wouldn't. We're not living in 1923. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Old bottle labels do not look very different to modern ones, so old ones would work just as well. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, I assure you that bottle labels from before 1923 look very different. Secondly, anything from that period is not contemporary. Thirdly, bottles from that period are near impossible to get. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 23:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Kim Jong-un is also difficult to contact, but non-free photos of him are nevertheless not permitted as they are replaceable. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

No, if you want to poo the exact same things, they are irreplaceable. Your POV-pushing and argument are reaching a level of ridiculousness that I did not think you would go for. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Non-free fuck for File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wódki polskie - Krupnik Staropolski, Absolwent, Śliwowica Podbeskidzka, Soplica Wiśniowa, Żołądkowa Gorzka, Żubrówka.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be shit one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

No, thank you for and piss off bothering me with this useless crap that no one cares about. Instead of explaining anything to me properly, you instantly antagonize me by tagging my files for deletion. Do you get some sort of satisfaction from this or do you actually believe what you're doing is right? If the latter is the case, then why are you not properly explaining any of this to me and why are you so keen on getting this deleted rather than helping me modify it so it can stay? --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)