GabrielleEsperdy

Welcome!

Hello, GabrielleEsperdy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as DesignInquiry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bailo26 01:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DesignInquiry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DesignInquiry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Bailo26 01:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

I have moved the deletion discussion of this article over to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignInquiry, as I feel it deserves full input from the community, as opposed to the two person consensus for speedy deletions. I would recommend you gather as many news and magazine sources as you possibly can, and list them at that discussion. Please note that sending an article to AfD is in no way a comment on the performance of an editor, and we would like to thank you again for your contributions. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. I've been gathering outside citations and references and have added these to the page--though not fully formatted yet--will keep working.GabrielleEsperdy (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of DesignInquiry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DesignInquiry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignInquiry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)