User talk:Gabriel Yuji/Archive5

WP:Fancruft

Please note that WP:Fancruft is an essay, and therefore can not be used as a valid reason for removing content from articles. If you wish to cite a policy or a guideline when doing so, feel free, but doing this gives the impression that WP:Fancruft is a policy or guideline, and it is not likely to ever attain that status. Thanks for all your hard work! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator discussion

Hello! You're invited to express your opinion in the following discussion from an article you've recently edited: Talk:Guilty Gear Xrd#New Article for Revelator? Jotamide (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Allen Walker

Allen Walker became a GA! I couldn't have done it without you. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Speaking of GAs, sorry about any overlinking on Halden Prison. It's a serious addiction, you know :) GAB^gab 23:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Haha, GeneralizationsAreBad, just fine! At least, it's a unharmful addiction (except for GA reviewers :P). Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

FF: Spirit Within edit

No problem! Thanks for the heads up. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A, A Prime

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A, A Prime you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A, A Prime

The article A, A Prime you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A, A Prime for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halden Prison

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halden Prison you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halden Prison

The article Halden Prison you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Halden Prison for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Islamo-Leftism

Hi. You removed a reference from the article with the edit summary "not appropriate per WP:EL". Leaving aside the fact that WP:EL doesn't apply to citations, I don't understand why a professor's faculty page is inappropriate under WP:EL. Could you please explain? Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey, MShabazz, it was not being used as a reference; the reference to that Fraser's statement is this one and I've removed a link to his profile which isn't necessary to support anything there. I've removed it mainly because of WP:ELPOINTS #2: "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article" (though it's my fault that I was not precisely enough in my summary). Thanks, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I thought the website was being used as a source for his being a professor. There was a time when many articles used raw links like that as sources, but thankfully that's no longer the case. Thanks again for the explanation. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I see your point, MShabazz; but I agree with you that's not necessary (the paper itself describes Fraser). Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Yu Kanda

I think I found that Graphic source when searching key words "Kanda" and "Willingham" using the engine to find reliable sources from the project. I've hidden that source for now. About nominating it to GA, I'll try doing once it gets copy-edited. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Berserk 2016

Thanks for your editing on Berserk 2016 episodes - I've given up. Ozflashman (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Oh, Ozflashman, I hope I haven't done you give up because I'd very much like all help as possible. A co-work is always better and I don't have too much time recently to edit, my English is not the best, and of course I can always miss something important. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The First President of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karel Kosík, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnum opus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gabriel Yuji. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Rozen Maiden straw vote

Hi. Thank you for your input at the AFD. If possible, could you drop by for a straw vote to determine if the article should be redirected (linked here)? Thanks. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Lead paragraph

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Lead paragraph. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
(Notification per WP:CAN.)

Trying another FA

I'm currently working in nominating the GA D.Gray-man to FA but I requested a copyedit and a peer review. The peer review seems to be doing fine, so I wonder if you could you give a look through that also. Also, nice work in the wikipedia articles. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Also, I don't know if you are aware but I have been working a bit on Yoh Asakura. I'm pretty sure it passes notability, but I've just realized the appearances section is incomplete with both the manga and anime series. It is potentially a GA if it also referenced too but I don't what to do with the techniques section. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Tintor2, I saw your changes since I watch this page; nice job. I would just remove techniques for containing too much WP:IN-U and/or try to incorporate the most relevant parts into the appearance section. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

"White Bear" copyedit

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "White Bear" (Black Mirror) has been completed.

You might want to give some thought to shortening the Themes and Reception sections. I'm sure a GA reviewer will point out that a lot of the reviews/comments are repetitive. The most important review vehicles are probably the ones to leave in.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#3). I suggest you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=28 February 2017}}. Not all websites allow archiving, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Good luck with the GAN

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Request for help with Draft:Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator

Hello! A while ago I started putting together this draft article but fell behind with it unfortunately. Now I would like to get it done before the next release (Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator 2) is out. I've left this message on your talk page since you have recently participated in the Guilty Gear Xrd article. Hope you can give me a hand. Thanks in advance. :) Jotamide (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Jotamide I'm not sure I can help right now but I may give a help in the future. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry

I accidentally reverted your edit on Samurai Jack cos I accidentally clicked "vandalism" without realizing. I already reverted mine.Tintor2 (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem, Tintor2. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

ACCA: 13-Territory Inspection Dept.

Sorry. Somehow I edited this talk page when I meant to edit another talk page. Too many tabs open at once. Thanks for catching it. Mitchumch (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem, Mitchumch. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Captain Olimar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Captain Olimar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of White Bear (Black Mirror)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article White Bear (Black Mirror) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 11:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of White Bear (Black Mirror)

The article White Bear (Black Mirror) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:White Bear (Black Mirror) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White Bear (Black Mirror), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of White Bear (Black Mirror)

The article White Bear (Black Mirror) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White Bear (Black Mirror) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Aniway Devilman retrospective

Here is a link to the translation I did for the article on Devilman. I hope this is useful. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. I'll be following your userpage this week in case you do. Word document file. ~Mable (chat) 13:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Slave characters in video games has been nominated for discussion

Category:Slave characters in video games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 00:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Paulo Coelho has been nominated for discussion

Category:Paulo Coelho, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gabriel Yuji. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis Althusser, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Depression and Locke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposal to upmerge category

Please see my proposal to speedily upmerge Category:2006 Scottish television series debuts to Category:2006 British television programme debuts. Hugo999 (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Sasuke Uchiha

Me and a fellow editor started a peer review here regarding Sasuke Uchiha in late December to see if it can become FA based on its copyedits and its real world information. I would appreciate if you could edit or comment if you have the time. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits. By the way, I believe you might know that Shaman King moved to Kodansha. That means Shueisha removed all of its volumes on sale. As a result, I tried searching for archives with archivebot. While the original series is sourced, I couldn't find Flowers' volumes in archvies. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

C (anime)

Hi Gabriel, I've done some paraphrasing of the reviews in the Reception section where possible; you might wish to check my changes. Good luck with your planned GA nom; I think it'll pass. :) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrie (2002 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Wanna exchange reviews?

Over 30 days ago, Flowerpiep nominated Boruto: Naruto the Movie to GA. No reviews so far. I noticed C (anime) was recently nominated for the same goal. Wanna exchange reviews? While I think the C article will become a GA, I wonder whether the in-universe information about the characters lack citations. Ping me if you want to do the exchange. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I've started a discussion over at Talk:C (anime)/GA1, although you're still free to leave comments there. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gabriel Yuji. You have new messages at Talk:C (anime)/GA1.
Message added 12:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of C (anime)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article C (anime) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

By the way, wanna exchange reviews? I nominated Nagi Yanagi for GA status yesterday and it could use some reviewing. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Internet Shopping Prince Yoshimi Ida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Region 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carrie (2002 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carrie (2002 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 03:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carrie (2002 film)

The article Carrie (2002 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carrie (2002 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 00:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

FA review

Maybe you don't know but Sasuke Uchiha is going through a FA review here. If possible, could you provide comments or a source review to the article? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 10:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

I already saw it, Tintor2. I prefer to not get involved because I have no experience with FAs and I may be biased because of my involvement with anime (also, both you and I are non-native English speakers so it may be problematic). Thanks, anyway. (The same goes for why I didn't want to review your GA; sorry for not answering at that time... Narutolovehinata5 was faster than me) Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Understood. Still, source review is simple checking is the references are used reasonable for Wikipedia's rules like being archived, linked consistently, etc. rather than focusing on prose. Flowerpiep nominated it so and he seems to be good with editing prose. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of C (anime)

The article C (anime) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:C (anime) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 06:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)