User talk:Gabbyshoe/Talk 1

Speedy deletion of CableLink

A tag has been placed on CableLink requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

"new" TV stations

Hi, I have observed that you are adding "new" stations on several TV networks. Did you get this new list from the NTC? Please provide valid sources on this additions since most of them are possible hoaxes. (Example: 3 TV stations for the same TV network on one province is not possible.) Thanks. -danngarcia (talk) 08:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Present shows on previously aired shows on TV5 article

Don't blame me for those additions, check out the edits of User:ArnoldDumlao. He's the one who adds them. -danngarcia (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DZMM2009.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DZMM2009.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DZMMTR2009.JPEG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DZMMTR2009.JPEG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Solar TV

I have nominated Solar TV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ViperSnake151  Talk  12:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Howard's Message to Me

I have an understanding with that user that he had to remove schedules for American TV articles first. I'm also in favor of their removal, as long as it is applied consistently. –Howard the Duck 13:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Please post your comments in English

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Im sorry for that. -Gabby (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Cignal Digital TV Article and other Philippine and Asian Cable/Satellite TV Vandalized Article

Hello!!!

Can you block this IP user 112.200.246.4 is also the same IP users as 112.200.224.120, 112.200.129.26, 112.200.231.104, 112.200.210.102, 112.200.140.201, 112.200.207.230 among other IP users are tying to vandalized articles like Cignal Digital TV and other Philippine Cable and Satellite Articles like SkyCable and even Asian Cable and Satellite Articles like Indovision inserting suspicious news about future channel and non program channels using Philippine actor and actress, which is not true at all.

Please help to solve this problem to block this user at all. Im begging you!! Puppyph —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.168.42 (talk) 05:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TV5 News.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TV5 News.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

AIV

Thank you for your recent report to WP:AIV, but I have declined it because users are allowed to blank their talk pages, so it is not considered vandalism. Also, the user was not warned before reporting and, per our blocking policy, IP addresses are almost never blocked indefinitely. —DoRD (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your message Yes, blanking pages is vandalism unless the page is the user's own talk page, in which case it is not vandalism. Intentionally adding false information to an article, on the other hand, is vandalism, but as I have no knowledge of Philippine stars or TV stations, it would be difficult for me to spot such vandalism. If the user continues that sort of vandalism, please report them again to AIV so that another admin may act on it. Thank you. —DoRD (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Gabbyshoe. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to GMA Network, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Homework2 ^{pass a note}sign! 14:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Philippine Cable Channel Line-Up removed articles

Hello!!

May I ask that the user Active Banana are trying to removed Philippines Cable Channel especially channel line-up like SkyCable, Global Destiny Cable, Cablelink, Cable Star Iloilo among other and also include 3 Philippine DTH provider like Dream Satellite TV, G Sat, and Cignal Digital TV to know the current channels of the said cable in Philippines for unknown reason. How about the Asian Cable or Satellite Channel are now display their current channel line-up in their respective article but why the Philippines attacking the Philippines Cable and DTH articles???!!! He or she almost destroy anything without permission or any reason itself to put unknown warning or what so ever. Can you please block this user to immediately to teach him a lesson. I though he or she is not a Filipino, a vandalizer or even another Gerald Gonzales itself. It was reveal that he is an Indian Tamil national user he is reveted article about the Philippines especially in Philippines Cable and DTH articles. can you include him or her to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or you can ask for a page to be protected at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection as I mention of these Philippine Cable and DTH articles -- Puppyph ^{(Puppyph•contribs)} 03:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppets

Hello, if you really think that I am a sock puppet, you will need to make your case at the proper notice board: WP:SSP. Until that time, please do not make accusations on my talk page or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Nor should you be accusing others of being sock puppets without having first activated an official sock puppet investigation.

Making unsubstantiated accusations is a violation of our policies. WP:NPA / WP:CIVIL. Thanks! Active Banana (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Gabbyshoe. You have new messages at Talk:DZIQ.
Message added Bluemask (talk) 11:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Discussion at WP:NOT

There is a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#NOTDIR_include_current_channel_listings about a topic that you have expressed interest in the past. Active Banana (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Ely Cruz Ramirez

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ely Cruz Ramirez. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ely Cruz Ramirez

The article Ely Cruz Ramirez has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:CIVIL / WP:NPA

I am not sure how many times you will need to be reminded (and if you keep forgetting, getting blocked), but you cannot make calls for someone not to edit certain articles simply because you think that they are from one particular country or another.[1] Please stop attacking other articles and stick to discussing content of articles. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppets

If you believe that an editor is a sock puppet, the appropriate place to initiate an investigation is WP:SSP. Active Banana (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aksyon Ngayon

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Aksyon Ngayon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Active Banana (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)