Contents


AfD nomination of 2012 California earthquake

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2012 California earthquake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 California earthquake. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Warrah (talk) 02:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Beltsville Speedway

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Beltsville Speedway, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thevintageracer.com/tracks/beltsville.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2012 Las Vegas earthquake

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2012 Las Vegas earthquake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Las Vegas earthquake. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Warrah (talk) 03:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Beltsville Speedway, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.thevintageracer.com/tracks/beltsville.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Beltsville Speedway saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

While there is now less of a copy/paste issue, it still reads as a close paraphrase and requires further rewriting. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the effort you put into the article. It no longer appears to be a copyright problem of any kind. Keep up the good work! VernoWhitney (talk) 02:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
You're welcome, VernoWhitney. GVnayR (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ecological importance of bees

I have nominated Ecological importance of bees, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecological importance of bees. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PirateArgh!!1! 07:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Help

Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help.

  • I clicked on both links and I saw that the pages were deleted. Besides, I specialize in Japanese video games and old NASCAR races. Thanks for offering but I respectfully decline. GVnayR (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:Chevrolet NASCAR race wins

I don't understand the use of this category. How is this an important way to categorize races?

On a side note, I don't understand why you used the word "Former" in Category:Former NASCAR Cup Series champions. While that is a useful way to group articles, there is only a single current champion. Royalbroil 04:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

This is a way to determine which manufacturer won a certain race in NASCAR history. According to the data gathered so far, Chevrolet won the most races. GVnayR (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
But why does this need a category? Chevy has won so many races. How is this a useful way to group races - by the car make of the winner? Royalbroil 04:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Some people may want to know exactly how many wins Chevrolet has won between 1949 and the present day. Some goes for Toyota, Ford, Dodge, Pontiac, and all the other brands. By categorizing the exact wins each manufacturer has got, you instill some pride into the brand name. GVnayR (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
I have started a thread at WikiProject Motorsport about grouping race wins by manufacturer. Please comment there with your opinion. Royalbroil 13:04, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Former NASCAR champs

I have created speedy rename nominations for the categories that you created for NASCAR champions because categories aren't supposed to have "Former" in the title. They're all former champions in the sense that the word former means in the past. You can read about it in the naming guidelines at Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(categories)#Occupation which was my rationale. You can oppose these changes at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy#Add_requests_for_speedy_renaming_here. They'll likely happen in 48 hours if you don't.

Otherwise I see that you've been doing a good job creating race articles about races from the earlier days of NASCAR. I can't see a pattern to what you're doing - but in an case it looks good. Once in a while you've started articles on drivers that were in the back of mind to do. Royalbroil 14:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for commending my hard work towards the articles that I created about the old NASCAR races. In fact, I specialize in old-school NASCAR in addition to Japanese video games. My appreciation for NASCAR started around 2006 or so. Since then, I have been curious to know every milestone and race that NASCAR has ever done. GVnayR (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

File:JoeandMacNATitleScreen.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JoeandMacNATitleScreen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Hi

Hi GVnayR, I've noticed your name pop up on some of the ZX Spectrum game articles on my watchlist, so thought I would say hello! That is all. Marasmusine (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I would also like to say hello to you, Marasmusine. GVnayR (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Tenchi Muyou! Game Hen

Greetings,

I would like to extend my appreciation for the thanks and in return, say that you're welcome :) I absolutely love the Tenchi Muyo! series and when I got my hands on the ROM of the game I couldn't stop playing it. I hadn't revised an article in a long time and remembering the game made me curious to look it up on Wikipedia.

Again, you are very welcome :)

Valce (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


1978 Delaware 500

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1978 Delaware 500, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.racing-reference.info/race?s=7&series=W&id=1978-24. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Problem solved. GVnayR (talk) 15:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:NASCAR race wins by manufacturer

I have nominated Category:NASCAR race wins by manufacturer and its subcategories, a category that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 July 7#Category:NASCAR race wins by manufacturer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Falcadore (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Trortured tenses

I can see absolutely no justification for a separate article on the death of Fireball Roberts. What is there in your text which cannot be added to the Fireball Roberts article? (Yes, we do have some "death of" articles - murder of Sally Anne Bowman springs to mind because it happened within a couple of miles of my house - but they are only needed when the dead person has no other claim to notability.)

In your text you used "would be" or just "would" three times in the first two sentences. What was wrong with: "Fireball Roberts was involved in a terrible crash at the 1964 World 600 and was sent to hospital in Charlotte, North Carolina. He died on July 2nd of that year; leaving behind a wife …" I appreciate that the use of "tortured tenses" like this is widespread among American writers. If you can, please explain on behalf of all these people why the use of such tenses is felt preferable to the simple past. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I happen to find the phrase "sent to hospital" a bit too British and news-like for my tastes. I learned most of my English as a young boy watching American television shows and they always said "sent to the hospital" or "going to the market." GVnayR (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually "taken to hospital" would probably have been better. At least you did not use the horrible British journalese where people are always "rushed to hospital" irrespective of their condition! But what do you say about the "would be"s? I repeat: do not take it personally - I have seen it from many different authors. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

1966 Firecracker 400

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1966 Firecracker 400, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.racing-reference.info/race?s=5&series=W&id=1966-28. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Mission accomplished. GVnayR (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Biomediation

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Biomediation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.berkeleyside.com/2010/06/04/berkeley-scientist-advises-on-clean-up-in-gulf-oil-spill. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC) Solved the problem and redirected the article into the Bioremediation article. GVnayR (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Bart Simpson's Escape from Camp Deadly

Hi GVnayR. Happy birthday! :) Is Emucontrolcenter a place where you can download ROMs? If so, we shouldn't link to it per WP:COPYLINK. Theleftorium (talk) 14:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the Happy Birthday greeting, Theleftorium. It is a privilege being a Wikipedian alongside you. GVnayR (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Infobox video game

There was a discussion about standardizing the infobox and dropping some fields, which resulted in a big overhaul. Just so you don't waste time on adding obsolete fields. Prime Blue (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm very sorry about that. GVnayR (talk) 13:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
No need to be sorry, I just thought I should give you a heads-up. :-) Prime Blue (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Another time-sparing notice

You don't have to fix wikilinks that ain't broken. :-) Prime Blue (talk) 08:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The New Guy Dizzy Harrison.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:The New Guy Dizzy Harrison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The New Guy Dizzy Harrison.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:The New Guy Dizzy Harrison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

 

The article List of Major League Baseball teams by population has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is just a list that isn't even fully sourced and doesn't have a real purpose. Seems to be in line to be more original research ("hypothetical cities").

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Major League Baseball teams by population for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of Major League Baseball teams by population, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball teams by population until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:Epic Sony Record games

You need to "subst:" the cfd template per WP:CfD. Rich Farmbrough, 15:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC).

Thanks for remininding me. I'll try to remember next time. GVnayR (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Private Eye

Greetings. I noticed you made some additions to the article for Private Eye. However, as the information you added was not backed up by a reliable source, it was undone. If you have a source indicating that Atari was distributing the game on behalf of Activision, or that the "Model A" suggested by the game's instruction manual is the specific style you attempted to wikilink, by all means include it before adding it back. If you have any questions, please leave them here or on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 18:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Honda video games

 

Category:Honda video games, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Donnie Park (talk) 21:30, 6 October 2010 (UTC)