MfD nomination of User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell

edit

User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Step in My Shoes for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Step in My Shoes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Step in My Shoes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A Christian Banned for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Christian Banned is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Christian Banned until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Breeze harbour listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Breeze harbour. Since you had some involvement with the Breeze harbour redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply