GKlimala

November 2022

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Can you please educate me as to why not only my change was removed but so was a post that had been there for a long time prior my change? Could you not have commented on my post in the TALK tab BEFORE removing my change as I had commented there a week prior as to my intentions and did not receive any objections. And looking now I STILL don't see any objections to my changes. And the sites I linked to I have zero affiliation with and I linked them as a form of education not advertising. And yes I did go to the guidelines and I didn't see any rule I broke which is why Im asking you to please explain. Thank you. GKlimala (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Please read the guideline on external links. Wikipedia is not a directory of external links. Your additions were in obvious violation of the guideline. MrOllie (talk) 01:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

The definition of Obvious is as an adjective easily perceived or understood; clear, self-evident, or apparent, none of which apply here as I had to go to another link and find the answer, an answer that Im still rather unsure I broke as I see links posted like what I did frequently. For someone who is so anally retentive and loves to throw that editing hammer around you don't seem to fully understand what that word means as you wave it like its some sort of crown. Try not to be so righteous with your editing as the way you state things feels rather insulting and holier than though which I suppose might be the reason people don't take too kindly to your changes as is VERY obvious (see what I did there?) by your talk page. That said, I was doing this for a school project where my professor was trying to help us understand that the Wiki community are unbiased, fair and lead with integrity. You, dear sir, have proven my original assessment of this community as truth and my professor has a wishful thinker. I'm sure you can imagine the obvious (again, see how I used it?) opinion I had. Thank you. GKlimala (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2022 (UTC)