GGliddy
G G Liddy's Talk
Hi edit
I'm guessing you are somebody but I'm hearing you are a nobody. Can you contact me so I can ask you a few private questions about a contribution here?Myraedison (talk) 10:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Daniel Colegrove for deletion edit
A discussion has begun about whether the article Daniel Colegrove, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Colegrove until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Chaser (talk) 06:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
How unfortunate I missed all this, I actually have just dug out a bunch of print articles from the 80s about his career as well as the controversy surrounding his photojournalism works. GGliddy (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- It's at User:GGliddy/Daniel Colegrove. Also see my comments on my user talk. Cheers.--Chaser (talk) 06:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:GGliddy/Daniel Colegrove edit
User:GGliddy/Daniel Colegrove, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GGliddy/Daniel Colegrove and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:GGliddy/Daniel Colegrove during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Photographer daniel colegrove.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)