G-Lignum

Welcome!

Hello, G-Lignum, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Science of Wood, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 07:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Science of Wood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Science of Wood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.be/books?id=MUq3EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA25&dq=%22wood+and+moisture+relations%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZwMrsxvyBAxXmcaQEHfNzDpAQ6AF6BAgNEAI#v=onepage&q=%22wood%20and%20moisture%20relations%22&f=false and (Very close paraphrasing). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 07:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I do accept this. G-Lignum (talk) 07:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Sorry! G-Lignum (talk) 07:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I will write from the very beginning the whole article, and I pay high attention to the Wikipedia rules. G-Lignum (talk) 08:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Draft:Science of Wood

Hello G-Lignum! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Science of Wood, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://books.google.be/books?id=MUq3EAAAQBAJ&hl=en, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Science of Wood and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Science of Wood, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Science of Wood. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Science of Wood with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Science of Wood saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

G-Lignum, you can rewrite the text at this special page (follow the link to reach it). Please don't copy any compromised content from the previous version (that would make your rewrite useless!), or make any attempt to edit the blanked version of the draft. If you have questions you can ask them here. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much! However, I had written and uploaded (already before I see your message) the following article, fully with my own words. Please check and examine it, Wood science - Thanks for the kindness. G-Lignum (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sodium sulfite

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sodium sulfite, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I think I fixed it. G-Lignum (talk) 15:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Wood anatomy

Hi G-Lignum, please do not simply blank redirects, if you believe that a redirect does not belong, please nominate it for deletion at WP:RFD, first reading the notes at the top of the page before nominating. Happy editing! Justiyaya 12:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I am preparing a new one (article) right now (wood anatomy) ... that's why I did this. Sorry for not knowing the rules. G-Lignum (talk) 12:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

It is complicated for me this. Let me check and read it. G-Lignum (talk) 13:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Rainer Marutzky moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rainer Marutzky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I think you are right. It is weak in the references. G-Lignum (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! G-Lignum (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wood science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formaldehyde resin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rainer Marutzky has been accepted

Rainer Marutzky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

THANKS so much! G-Lignum (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on John Ralph

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Ralph, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try to do it. G-Lignum (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Elisabeth Wheeler

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Elisabeth Wheeler, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Urea into Bosch-Meiser process. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

I do apologise for this. Truly, I did not know this rule. G-Lignum (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

No worries! DanCherek (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for that helpful original contribution at Peter Niemz; I'm learning quite a bit about wood science this month - no bad thing! Klbrain (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Good for you! WOOD is a fantastic material, but not only this, also plenty chemical materials, that originate from the mother Nature! Thanks much for your comment! Stay tuned then. G-Lignum (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Since you love pharmacology, you -of course- know these (from wood & bark); Paclitaxel, Taxuspines, Docetaxel and others! Wood is good! I forgot; THANKS much for the coffee; actually, I do love it. G-Lignum (talk) 16:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, G-Lignum. Thank you for your work on Alfred Teischinger. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for another helpful biography for a Wood Scientist. The award lectures and prizes for a late-stage scientist reflect recognition in the field.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 05:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@Klbrain: Thank you so much. I agree with your comment.G-Lignum (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Suberinic acid while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Woodlot (talk) 17:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I appreciate your advice. I am a new wikipedia user, and this helps out. G-Lignum (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, G-Lignum. Thank you for your work on Composite index (metrics). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A relatively new metric, but it has had enough discussion in different sources to warrant inclusion.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

@Klbrain:: Thanks much, I will check it. G-Lignum (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)