G-Cup
Welcome!
editHello, G-Cup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Eleassar my talk 21:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Slovenia invite
edit
|
| Hello, G-Cup, and thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! |
March 2013
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Slovenian-style polka was changed by G-Cup (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932092 on 2013-03-31T14:37:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because the changes were not sourced. Fee lfree to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Flat Out let's discuss it 11:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Eleassar and thanks for raising your concern.
Recent revert and caution
edit- Hi, Flat Out. What was so uncostructive and disruptive with this edit? It was poorly worded and not sourced, but much newly added content is not. This does not make it unconstructive. --Eleassar my talk 07:44, 25 July 2013– (UTC)
- G-cup's first change was flagged by stiki as potential vandalism, which it clearly wasn't but I did perform a good faith revert and left a note (above) that I had reverted their edit as it was unsourced, with an offer of help. That first edit altered the meaning of a referenced paragraph by changing "population was expelled" to "population moved." I believe that was a fair good faith revert. The other part of that edit "Today, a small sign with a cross stands there" is not particularly well worded but if that had been the only changed I would have marked it "innocent" on stiki and moved on. The first notice I left (above) is reasonable and offers help. The editor then posted on my talk page saying they didn't need to provide a source and reinstated the part of the edit. Reinstating the edit after a good faith revert is not constructive, however I accept that a templated caution was probably excessive and I am going to remove that caution. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 05:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, G-Cup. I've seen you added some new information to the article Slovenia. It would be highly appreciated if you cited appropriate sources for these and checked your spelling ("expell upt to 250.000 Slovenians"). Sentences such as "More interesting was development of public sculpture after the second world war" are subjective and should be avoided. Also, in English we use a comma for thousands. I hope you take this message in good faith and thanks for correcting these mistakes. --Eleassar my talk 08:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks for corrections. "expell up to 250.000 Slovenians" Information from TV Slovenia, 11. maj 2014 2:35: Cilj nemškega okupatorja po zasedbi slovenskega ozemlja je bil že spomladi 1941 jasen: s Štajerske, Gorenjske in Koroške izgnati 220-260 tisoč Slovencev, torej vsakega tretjega, in na zasedenem ozemlju naseliti Nemce ter popolnoma germanizirati Slovence, ki so ostali. Izgon Slovencev je bil kljub temu, da se je načrt Nemcev posrečil le v manjši meri, eden najbolj krutih v Evropi. Tematika izgona je bila v nekdanji Jugoslaviji dolga desetletja potisnjena ob stran. Vedelo se je nekaj o izgonu 7.500 Slovencev v Srbijo, ničesar pa ni bilo nikoli javno povedanega o kar 45 tisoč izgnanih Slovencih v nemška izgnanska taborišča, od deset tisoč izgnanih na Hrvaško, prav tako ni bilo nobenega vedenja niti zgodovinskega zapisa o oblikah nasilja, ki ga je izvajal madžarski okupator na delu slovenskega ozemlja. V seriji so sodelovali številni pričevalci - izgnani Slovenci in Slovenke iz vseh delov Slovenije ter zgodovinar dr. Božo Repe. Oddaje so nastale ob dragoceni pomoči Društva izgnancev Slovenije 1941-1945, Muzeja slovenskih izgnancev v Brestanici in nemškega mesta Rudolfstadt.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |