User talk:Fusionmix/Archive 1

Cup of twee?

I must have mistaken you for the creator. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 23:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. RedZion^X 23:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

R. Kelly

Hello RedZionX, can you explain what your intention of this edit was? Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I just wanted to know if I've overlooked something. Happy editing! --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Exaggeration

In national sport soccer most popular in 100 and more nations is comic exaggeration!!!! May I edit for balanced article???? LEO, 8 December 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.87.241 (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

This is problem: article is total unsourced about soccer most popular!!!! Then if about Palestinian territories, Eritrea etc. we not have source, we not insert Palestinian territories, Eritrea etc. in that lier list!!!! It is impossible to find valid source of those nations because a source does not exist!!!! LEO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.87.241 (talk) 13:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

My friend, in Google no information about those nations then this is my proposal: to remove unsourced nations in list of soccer! LEO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.87.241 (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear RedZionX,

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because it seems that you don't have at least 250 mainspace edits. When you fulfill this requirement, feel free to re-apply.

Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

FAMULUS

I have removed your speedy deletion tag from the above article. A7 applies only to real people, organisations or web content. Robots are not included. I have prodded the article instead. J Milburn (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Undid my Candy Cane edits

RedZionX,

You undid my legitimate edits to the Candy Cane article [1]. I don’t know why, you did not leave an explanation. I re-did the changes, if you disagree please explain why before taking action. Grauw (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the explanation. —Grauw (talk) 01:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania

My edit to WrestleMania was legitimate, given that the result printed for the Lex Luger v. Yokozuna match was, in fact, incorrect. The specific page for WrestleMania X is correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.91.13.193 (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Vandalism

What? There was vandalism on my page? Sure, go ahead and "ARV" this vandal. Thanks for reverting the edits. Leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks again!--Jedi Kasra (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Two little tigers

I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Two little tigers. The reason is:

it has sufficient context to identify the subject of the article

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Myami The Hedgehog

An article that you have been involved in editing, Myami The Hedgehog, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myami The Hedgehog. Thank you.  Doktor  Wilhelm  23:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

added references to N&k Technology

I added some references to N&k Technology. I think the article shows notability now. --Eastmain (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

fourth generation

Hi red zion. I am new here but I thought I did leave desciptions in the edit summary of the fourth generation page. Sorry for the confusion.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.113.247 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 7 Feb 2008

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holigan

You tacked an AfD discussion for School House Comix onto the bottom of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holigan by mistake, instead of creating an actual discussion page. Since the School House Comix page was deleted anyway without discussion, I have simply removed the malformed discussion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:X9

The Template:X9 page is part of the WP:Sandbox. I already warned user 151.49.9.71, but then took my comments back when I discovered it is part of the sandbox. —BradV 17:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

You may want to consider removing your warning notices from User Talk:151.49.9.71. —BradV 17:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations/In_review#HaHaHaHaHaHa!_LOL_LOL!

The comment you left there was very funny. Cheers, Basketball110 _{i'm not yik ginlyùn} 04:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well believe me... you did just that. Basketball110 _{i'm not yik ginlyùn} 21:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Text deletion

I did explain. I said it wasnt neutal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.4.218.146 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 14 Feb 2008

ok I will sign my comments. 149.4.218.146 (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC) I think the sources used were not neutral

Thank you for all your help. You're a nice editor. 149.4.218.146 (talk) 22:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Briarcliff Manor Edit

I have undid your revision 191518812 of my edit on Briarcliff Manor which you leave no justification for deleting. It appears you make changes without checking any information. Any and all information I have placed into Wikipedia is factual, and for the data entered today a simple google search will provide verification of my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.128.149 (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

NO U

Grrr!24.56.52.134 (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Billy Bishop

I was intentionally going to revert the edit. But, however, you reverted it before I did. That's okay; I was looking at other stuff anyways. SchfiftyThree 02:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I knew you weren't accusing me; I might've just taken a little long to take the 'anders is gay' sentence out. SchfiftyThree 02:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Huggle concern

Hi mate, you recently made an error with this revert. As you know, Huggle can be a dangerous tool which must be used with caution, so that means extra care must be paid towards diffs. Not all IP user's are vandals; Libsey (who uses the 156.34x range) is a very experienced and committed user who clearly isn't a vandal. If you're not sure what vandalism is (You used the rollback feature for a non-vandalism related edit which is against policy) please read WP:VANDALISM. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 10:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi again, RedZionX! I was in Special:Listusers and looked under the Rollbacks section, and didn't see your name. Do you actually have it? If not, you should request for it here. It's a good tool for anti-vandalism work; it's even a little faster for reverting. SchfiftyThree 20:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Usurpation

The reason that accounts with significant edits can't be usurped is that under the GNU Free Documentation License all edits have to attributed to the user. If one was to usurp an account that had significant edits, it would create the false impression that the person who usurped the account made the edits. Since you are the owner of the other account, the fact that there are significant edits does not matter because the edits all point to the same user, you. Hopefully that clears things up. If you have any more questions, feel free to let me know! Icestorm815 • Talk 19:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that pornographic image added to my userpage. Guess I must have done something to upset them though, no idea what mind. Polly (Parrot) 22:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou for fixxing my db-nocontext

I'm new to this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamwade (talk • contribs) 23:39, 27 Feb 2008

Jimi Dams

Thank you for your efforts in making my article on Jimi Dams valid. I have added internal and external links. I welcome any other suggestions. Best, Kim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kldannebaum (talk • contribs) 20:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: RFA

I am doing that as I speak. --Obaidz96 (talk) 16:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Motto of the Day - Nominations

Confuses me. lol. I nominated "Remember kids, don't fight the bullies. If they hurt you, just tell a grown-up," a while ago. It is now in the awaiting decisions section, and has not received any vote in a while. And why are there so many nominations? Can't more than half of them be closed? If you could answer these questions, I would greatly appreciate it. (I'm just very confused). Cheers! iMatthew 2008 01:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Somewhat, because some of the mottos in "awaiting decision" are way older than 21 days. iMatthew 2008 21:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your question: go for it. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 22:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome, good to see someone's going to do it... ;) _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 22:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Haha, :D _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 22:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks. iMatthew 2008 22:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Fusionmix. You have new messages at Cro0016's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Soylent Green

Hi, sorry for the full text review insertion...I was in the process of editing it, and accidentally saved it before my summary was doneNazamo (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for tagging the user page for 163.153.249.14. The district has reported that they have identified the student and are taking appropriate actions. --NERIC-Security (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Nfs Pro street

Why did you undo My edit? I like NFS 11 Better to NFS Pro street, Also it used to say "In drag, players drift to emerge as the driver with the most points scored in the event" However With my edit says: In drift, players drift to emerge as the driver with the most points scored in the event. It's not nice to undo! 17:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

NFS

What about Need for speed Pro Street, Not Need for speed ProStreet 17:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I Dont say ip 18:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

~

I Type 5 of ~ like 17:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Because i don't want to give away IP Address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.179.105 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 7 Mar 2008

OK 18:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.179.105 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 7 Mar 2008

No way!

Dont look at IP! Hide it! PLEASE PLEASE

No way!

No way! Dont look at IP! Hide it! PLEASE PLEASE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.179.105 (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

IP

How do you hide IP. Tell me NOW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.179.105 (talk) 18:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

No way

I want to hide IP but Not make a profile (account)--18:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

IP

Where can i discuss IP, Tell me Please