A tag has been placed on Paulette scheme, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Paulette scheme is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Paulette scheme. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our general biography criteria. Wikipedia also is generally opposed to autobiography, as it is difficult to write an encyclopedia-style neutral article about yourself or people you are close to. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. No one of consequence 02:44, 22 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:Fscheme

edit

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to your user page (User:Fscheme), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).

Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or used as a general webhosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Calton | Talk 23:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply