Fruppence

Image tagging for Image:M a5d8eb3e7a2b7e70092fa807dfe20d82.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M a5d8eb3e7a2b7e70092fa807dfe20d82.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jesse Ellis

A tag has been placed on Jesse Ellis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 18:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Manchester United F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Jclemens (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Manchester United F.C., even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LeaveSleaves (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McGeddon (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Posted nonsense article Harry bath-barranco after above warnings. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Fruppence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

92.3.52.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Vandalism-only account

• Blocking administrator: NawlinWiki (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fruppence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i would like to appologise, the changes that were made wre not by me personllay, one of my collegues knew that i had an account and they were messing arround on it, as you can see the name harry bath-barranco was in one of the pages, he presumed that whatever he wrote would just automatically be chaged back, if you would please grant me back a fully functioning account, then i would prevent this happening in the future and would promptly change my password. in the last few days i have seen two pages that i would like to edit, for proper reasons.

Decline reason:

Temporarily declined pending 2nd-chance template below. Tan | 39 15:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
• Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
• Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
• Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Tan | 39 15:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

= Glyn Technology School =

{{sprotect2}}

Glyn Technology School
Address
The Kingsway, Ewell Epsom , Surrey , KT17 1NB England
Coordinates	51.3434°N 0.2559°W / 51.3434; -0.2559
Information
Type	foundation comprehensive
Established	1927
Local authority	Surrey
Specialist	Technology
Ofsted	Reports
Headteacher	Jon Chaloner
Deputy Headteachers	Mr. Mayhew & Mr. Wheatley
Gender	Boys
Age	11 to 18
Enrollment	1395
Houses	Abbey  , Bourne  , Carew  , Derby  , Merton  , St. Benet   and Tudor
Website	http://www.glyn.surrey.sch.uk/

Glyn Technology School is a single sex comprehensive secondary school that teaches boys from the ages of 11-18. It is situated in the borough of Epsom and Ewell, in the outlying suburbs of London.

History

It started as Glyn Grammar School for Boys, becoming comprehensive in 1985.

In 2003 construction of the a new building started at the school and was officially opened in 2005 by the Duke of Kent. This building was named the Turner Wing after the then current headteacher Mr Turner. He retired in 2006 after being Headmaster for 20 years. Glyn's sixth headteacher is Jon Chaloner who joined in September 2006, from Easthampsted Park School in Bracknell. At the same time an Old Boy, Douglas French, was appointed Chairman of the Governors.

Glyn's home sporting fixtures are played at Priest Hill on the Reigate Road.

Houses

There are seven houses at Glyn Technology School, which all have their own colour stripes on the students ties. They are: Abbey; Bourne; Carew; Derby; Merton; St.Benet and Tudor. Which have the colours light blue, black, red, green, blue, purple and yellow respectively. Each house in Glyn competes in house competitions such as basketball, football, rugby, table tennis, etc.

Controversy

The school came to national notice in 2002 as a test of government exclusion policy. Two boys expelled for making death threats to a teacher were ordered to be re-instated by an independent appeals panel. After a refusal by other teachers to teach the boys and an intervention by the then Secretary of State for Education, Estelle Morris, the boys were found places at other schools.

Notable Pupils

Glyn Grammar School

• John Austin, Labour MP for Erith and Thamesmead
• Dario Gradi, football manager

Glyn Technology School

• Paul Hodgson, London Irish and England Saxon's Rugby Union player
• Jack Cork, Defender who plays for Chelsea and England (currently on loan at Scunthorpe)

External links

• Glyn Technology School
• Ofsted report (2006)
• EduBase

[[Category:Technology Colleges in England]] [[Category:Boys' schools in England]] [[Category:Comprehensive schools in Surrey]] {{Surrey-school-stub}}

I don't believe the changes you've made (difference, you'll have to ignore all the talk page stuff) are significant enough to unblock you. They appear to be very minor, and also are not of an encyclopedic tone. When we ask for significant improvement, we're looking for a substantial improvement to the article, and preferably not one you have a conflict of interest with. For example, this article is currently marked as a stub, so a substantial improvement could be to work on expanding the article beyond that stub status, seeking out reliable sources to verify the content you've added. I'll not decline the request, to give others a chance to look into this, however I'd recommend you continue working on this article. Please also change the names back to their full names, without the Mr./Mrs. prefixes. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll have to agree. The only changes made are simply adding another position or two, changing the names to inappropriate formatting, and...nothing else. A 2nd chance attempt needs to make some seriously large improvements, not just a little bit of bookkeeping. Templarion (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, hang on. While I agree that Fruppence needs to try a little harder here to show us that he will be a constructive contribution to Wikipedia, I don't think we need to see "seriously large improvements". Myself, I'll be convinced if he/she tries again and does a little better. I'll be responsible for oversight for a few weeks if we decide to unblock. Tan | 39 01:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I was just going off what I thought was the intention. I misinterpreted, I guess. Templarion (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

• I am going to post a note to the blocking admin - if he agrees with Tan's offer to oversight I will unblock. I will return here as soon as I have an answer.--VS ^talk 10:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been unblocked

In light of your recent efforts to be a more constructive Wikipedian, you have been unblocked. Please note that I will be reviewing your contributions frequently, and if any are of a vandalistic nature, you will be re-blocked indefinitely. Of course, I am also here for any assistance you may need and will answer any questions you have (or point you to those who have an answer). Remember, you are on a zero-tolerance probationary period. Tan | 39 05:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Mini me.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Mini me.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Naming conventions

Hi there. I see you've been making a lot of changes to articles that reflect your own style preferences. Unfortunately, a lot of them don't match Wikipedia's manual of style. For example, your change of the title of Stunt performer is wrong; naming conventions dictate that the second word of non-proper nouns should be lowercase. Please stop grammatically changing article names and other minutia without fully understanding the conventions. Thanks! Tan | 39 01:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

In addition, I reverted all of your changes to Vern Troyer. Almost every one of your capitalizations and changes were grammatically incorrect or were against Wikipedia MoS. Please stop trying to copyedit articles without a better grasp of English grammar and Wikipedia conventions. Tan | 39 01:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bishop Kieran Conroy During Confirmation Event 2007.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)