FrostFairBlade, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi FrostFairBlade! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
176   Studio Chizu (talk) Add sources
17   Cannabis in Zimbabwe (talk) Add sources
195   Cannabis in Ireland (talk) Add sources
9   Cannabis in Bolivia (talk) Add sources
48   MSN Chat (talk) Add sources
43   IRCd (talk) Add sources
5   Engels' Pause (talk) Cleanup
20   Cannabis in Slovakia (talk) Cleanup
790   Toei Animation (talk) Cleanup
30   Cannabis in Finland (talk) Expand
128   Aztec architecture (talk) Expand
39   Cannabis in Ukraine (talk) Expand
1,282   Fashion design (talk) Unencyclopaedic
55   Late night anime (talk) Unencyclopaedic
254   Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland (talk) Unencyclopaedic
88   Bekishe (talk) Merge
266   Western dress codes (talk) Merge
43   Rekel (talk) Merge
11   Hamdi Kayapınar (talk) Wikify
22   Cannabis in Lebanon (talk) Wikify
9   Cannabis in Bosnia and Herzegovina (talk) Wikify
25   Drug abuse in Hong Kong (talk) Orphan
4   Yui Minami (talk) Orphan
7   Microchip implant privacy in animals (talk) Orphan
7   Way Over There (talk) Stub
9   Remic (talk) Stub
14   Cannabis in Eswatini (talk) Stub
25   Cannabis in Tanzania (talk) Stub
189   Saul Phillips (basketball) (talk) Stub
16   Cannabis in Fiji (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

 

Your work on Howard Phillips (consultant) was great. What an unsung topic, taken from a stub to C and hopefully way beyond. I did some initial work on it long ago, and immediately afterward, I saw a surprise that really made me think. I assume there's more to cover, with his quotes and maybe even Nintendo Power magazine stuff. You were an instant wiki veteran, so what wiki did you come from? I recently did a similar expansion of R.O.B. and Radar Scope, which I never thought I could find anything on. So I expanded History of the Nintendo Entertainment System while I was at it. Lots of early NoA stuff. Let me know if I can help.

Smuckola(talk) 05:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


Thanks Smuckola! No previous experience with Wikis for me, but I've always liked doing research and writing, so that's probably why. I agree that there's still room for the article to be expanded upon. For example, I want to try and look at:
- his jobs after Nintendo (I'm not sure if he even worked at JVC, despite the cited sources),
- why he became so popular with Nintendo Power readers (currently, I think the article doesn't quite articulate this as well as I would like),
- expansion on his product testing responsibilities/collaboration with game developers
If you're able to help in any way in those areas, I'd really appreciate it! -FrostFairBlade (talk) 06:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@FrostFairBlade: Hey dude. I blew it up again, with your comments in mind. I added a fair amount of why he was popular with Nintendo Power readers. His Nintendo Power responsibilities included an overlap with his product testing skills, because product testing turns you into a product advocate. If you're cool enough, like him. I touched on game dev collaboration regarding Rare, but I'm not done yet and I bet there's more out there, though he tends to speak in sweeping whimsical soundbite generalizations in interviews. So yeah it could use maybe some more detail about product testing and development, and this is the best reference I've found so far, though specifically in terms of fact-checking the magazine.
No he didn't work at JVC, so I deleted that several days ago, and my edit summary said that. He said that JVC was the publisher for some of the LucasArts games, so that was a source of misinformation on the web. I've never seen that misinformation but I guess you have, so I will put a clarifying statement in there. His only job I'm personally concerned with after Nintendo, is talking about having worked at Nintendo. ;) lol
I love Howard, but I wouldn't have actually done all this without your interest! I've always got it in the back of my mind that I gotta show FrostFairBlade my warez. And I saw your other Nintendo founder work, very impressive, and went along with that. So keep in touch. Let me know if you have any issues with Wikipedia in general. It'll give me a notification if you reply using {{reply to | Smuckola}}.— Smuckola(talk) 04:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Smuckola: Wow, nice job with the Howard Phillips article! You definitely went above and beyond to take it to the next level in completeness. It's definitely a pretty solid piece right now; I'll probably look into his stuff after Nintendo when I get the chance.
Anyway, thanks for the help! Glad I could be a source of inspiration, lol. We'll definitely see each other again on other Nintendo articles for sure, not just Howard Phillips. -FrostFairBlade (talk) 07:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michio Okamura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diablo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Irving Street Kitchen edit

Thanks for expanding the article! I am curious if Good article status is your goal? ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Another Believer: Hey Another Believer! I think there's potential for the article to be GA, though I still have a lot of ground to cover. Even if it doesn't happen, I still fully believe it can be transformed into a well-researched B article at least.
Would you be interested in helping me with this goal? With your editing experience and you being a Portland native, you'd be a pretty big help. For example, for the life of me, I can't find any information on when or why the executive chef became a co-owner of the restaurant, among other things...
If not, no worries, I'll keep plugging away at the article! — FrostFairBlade (talk) 06:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
FrostFairBlade, Just FYI, I just uploaded four photographs of the restaurant's exterior to Wikimedia Commons. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer: Saw the upload, thanks for the help! -FrostFairBlade (talk) 20:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odette (restaurant) has been accepted edit

 
Odette (restaurant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 11:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Wow. You should probably put this at B class.[1]Smuckola(talk) 11:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Smuckola: Thanks Smuckola! I still think there's some stuff that I'd like to add and change that would turn it into a B-class, but the article's well on its way! -FrostFairBlade (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 3 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Carlson Block, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Japanese translations' request edit

User talk:Immanuelle/Proposed article translations. --95.233.233.43 (talk) 10:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply