User talk:Frood/Archive/3/2020
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re: Autism
Hello Frood. I'm sure that some autistic people are disobedient and stubborn, they know that it's not correct to do this, but they continue anyway. 138.229.19.202 (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Cool. You need to provide citation before making such a bold claim though. – Frood (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Some autistic people have obsessions, no matter what it's good or bad, they want to keep the same habit, no change ! 138.229.19.202 (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Tom Malinowski's Page
I deleted the section titled "Controversies" on Congressman Malinowski's page because the "Controversies" listed were simply people disagreeing with his beliefs. The section was seemingly posted with political motives, and people shouldn't be able to influence elections by creating fake controversies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NJFactChecker (talk • contribs) 18:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
Sorry for bothering you, but...
- New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 19:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
hello
fuck u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.33.133.33 (talk • contribs)
- Will do. – Frood (talk) 02:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
how does it feel to work for wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.33.133.33 (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- gonna answer for Frood here. it feels great to be contributing to the knowledge of the world, and to share our passions with everyone. Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 01:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Cheers... I guess
Thanks for your work against spam! you revert it so fast, there is nothing left for me 😞 Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC) |
- Oh man, it's been a hell of a week so I could use that... – Frood (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Sugar Maple
I want anyone who has an answer to this question "What is the name on offer of the indigenous sugar maple species, and which one is used for real Canadian maple syrup?" to have the answer on the page instead of my question. If the editors can't see my question, this information won't be found. I don't know if it could be solved, if you do, please forward my question as it should! But I've been trying to find the answer for a year. I would like to find it on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyulánk (talk • contribs) 01:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?