Freespeechman

Welcome

Please don't hesitate to write to me about anything.

Hi

I have read your comment on your user page about creating an account at last. Unfortunately it is true that some editors give less respect to anything from an IP editor than from an account. I can actually understand why that is so, because a very large proportion of IP editors are not very good, whether because of bad faith or because of inexperience, but it is obviously unfair to brand all IP editors as unconstructive, as many of them are excellent editors. If it's of any interest to you, I started off editing as an IP editor, and at first saw no point in bothering to create an account. However, eventually I did create an account because of an occasion when I found that the IP address I was trying to edit from was blocked. After that, I gradually found that there are more advantages to having an account than I had thought, perhaps the biggest one being to do with communication with other editors, but other things come up from time to time too. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Academy of Art University and conflicts of interest

Regarding your dismissive comments about "the 'COI' card": Does this mean that you reject the advice given by Justlettersandnumbers in Talk:Academy_of_Art_University#Conflict_of_interest, including the request to respect the Terms of Use? Regards, HaeB (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi @HaeB:, thanks for your reply. I fully accept the advice offered by @Justlettersandnumbers:, however the advice does not apply to me. I am not sure why this advice was offered to me in the first place, since (as noted previously) I feel that all of the edits that I suggested are relevant to the article's subject and are firmly rooted in reliable sources so as to comply with Wikipedia' guidelines. In fact, if anything it seems that the reversions being continually made by Justlettersandnumbers suggest something of a vested interest in censoring any non-negative information about the subject, violating WP:NPOV. I'd be more than open to any specific feedback and/or tweaks to edits that I've made, but the editor in question refuses to participate in any sort of productive discussion on the matter. Please advise if you believe there is a route that I have not taken in resolving this disagreement. Otherwise, I have no choice other than formal WP:Dispute Resolution." Freespeechman (talk) 09:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TaxSlayer Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaxSlayer Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)