Freelolita101
Hi,I'm Freelolita101 and this is my talk page.Enjoy!
June 2009
editPlease do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Miami Seaquarium. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ThePointblank (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Lolita (orca), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ThePointblank (talk) 02:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
In regards to your query,
Please be very familiar with WP:ORIG, WP:NPOV, WP:SOURCE, WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:NOTOPINION. If you have any further questions as to what possibility constitutes a violation of Wikipedia policies, please feel free to ask me, or go to WP:VILLAGE where others can help you. ThePointblank (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- You can insert that as long as you provide a strong reference that is considered neutral and reliable, as stated in WP:ORIG. ThePointblank (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't think websites like orcanetwork.com will fly as a strong source under WP:SOURCES. As stated under WP:SOURCES:
In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. Electronic media may also be used. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable the source is.
Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications.
I don't see evidence of peer-reviewed sources, nor is it mainstream. Remember, contributions can be challenged at anytime, especially if they have no sources or non-reliable sources attached to them. ThePointblank (talk) 20:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Your help desk question
editYou might find what you are looking for in the article about Lolita (orca). If you cannot find the answer there, you can try asking your question at Wikipedia's Reference Desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer just about any question in the universe (except about how to use Wikipedia, which is what this help desk is for). I hope this helps. TNXMan 14:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
You have new answers to at WP:NCH#Freelolita101 Talking. SpinningSpark 17:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Freelolita101! I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject Warriors. We work on improving Warriors articles and would appreciate your help. Cheers! Brambleclawx (talk) 17:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- You can join by going to Wikipedia:WikiProject Warriors#Active and adding your name to the bottom of the list!!!
WikiProject Warriors role call
editDelivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Warriors at 05:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC).