FreddieMartyn
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi FreddieMartyn! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:05, Monday, November 2, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi FreddieMartyn! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:49, Monday, November 2, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Paid editing on Wikipedia edit
Hello FreddieMartyn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to EURACTIV. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FreddieMartyn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FreddieMartyn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Bri! You asked if I'm currently receiving or expect to receive compensation for the edits made on the EURACTIV page. I wanted to inform you that I am not. I do work in that area, but not for that company. It's a super well known company in my field of work, and I wanted to ensure that other curious minds were satisfied. Thank you for the enquiry! Freddie (talk) 23:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- The reason I asked is because your name appears on their website as an author. Can you elucidate? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh that! I wrote one opinion piece that was published there once. I created the EURACTIV page because it had no trusted sources, so I made some changes, and I was new to Wikipedia, so it took a few edits. Thank you for looking out! I work in European regional policy. Freddie (talk) 10:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The reason I asked is because your name appears on their website as an author. Can you elucidate? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EURACTIV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EURACTIV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:YRN Logo Ideas-1-07.png edit
Thank you for uploading File:YRN Logo Ideas-1-07.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)