In response to your feedback

edit

You might be able to search for your interest areas using Google --- add 'site:wikipedia.org' without the apostrophes to limit the results.

Ariconte (talk) (Email me) 02:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback

edit

The short answer is: Yes. Inline references to support the text of an article give source information and prove the text is not 'Original Research' (see WP:OR). External links are of limited use ... see WP:EL.

Ariconte (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Invitation to tea

edit
 
Hello! Fred.Pendleton, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Charles (talk) 09:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi Fred! So glad you stopped by the Teahouse, welcome! Looks like, based on your profile, you'll be a great Wikipedian =) Stop by the Teahouse to lend a hand or ask a question anytime. See you there! Sarah (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Fred.Pendleton. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Linking_to_orphan_articles.
Message added 22:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An answer has been posted to your question in Teahouse! Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 22:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Message sent with Global message delivery.

A pie for you!

edit
  Hi Fred! I wanted to say hi and congratulations on all your awesome edits you are making. Makes me super happy to see a new editor like yourself find your niche so quickly. Feel free to ping us at the Teahouse if you need anything. Enjoy this freshly baked wiki-pie!! Sarah (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Minor barnstar
I, Sarah, hereby award you, Fred, with the Minor Barnstar for your great efforts at de-orphaning articles, among other small but valuable tasks. Thanks so much and keep up the awesome work! Sarah (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

De-orphaning and wikilinking

edit

Hello Fred Pendleton. Thanks for your efforts at de-orphaning articles. However when doing so, please take care to ensure that articles that you are wikilinking do actually have a connection in real life. Things having the same name is not an assurance of this. For example, I have had to remove all the links you added in order to de-orphanise Abbott Street, as the article subjects have no real-life connection and the linking would merely have baffled readers. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help, PaleCloudedWhite. I should've taken into account that "Abbott Street" can point to a number of places. In any case, thanks for the feedback, and I won't make the same mistake again. Cheers! Fred.Pendleton (talk) 01:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Referencing Articles

edit

I've noticed you added a lot of references to articles recently besides de-orphaning them, so I thought you might like to join our wikiproject! Just one quick note: make sure your references are reliable and are not based off of Wikipedia. There are a lot of websites out there that copy articles from Wikipedia, but we can't cite those. That's why I had to remove your reference to James A.C. Brown because the Trueknowledge website cites Wikipedia as a source. Otherwise, keep up the good work! Altamel (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply