Welcome!

Hello, FreakyFlyBry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

My talk page can be found here!

-Jetman123 05:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Succession Boxes for number 1s edit

Well done on updating them! Good work! Triangle e 13:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Declan thankyou.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Declan thankyou.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of D-Natural edit

 

A tag has been placed on D-Natural requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 23:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of D-Natural edit

 

A tag has been placed on D-Natural requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 23:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ca-sk-sa.gif) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Ca-sk-sa.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of I'm in Miami Bi**h edit

I have nominated I'm in Miami Bi**h, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm in Miami Bi**h. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Coastergeekperson04's talk@ 23:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DbClifford edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DbClifford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alexf(talk) 19:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of DbClifford edit

 

The article DbClifford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence in English of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm Boring listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect I'm Boring. Since you had some involvement with the I'm Boring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. FallingGravity (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, FreakyFlyBry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, FreakyFlyBry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

WIFLf*g listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WIFLf*g. Since you had some involvement with the WIFLf*g redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —IB [ Poke ] 11:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, FreakyFlyBry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rock and rool listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rock and rool. Since you had some involvement with the Rock and rool redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 02:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wf*gLY listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wf*gLY. Since you had some involvement with the Wf*gLY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sometimes You Whatever listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sometimes You Whatever. Since you had some involvement with the Sometimes You Whatever redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teardrops On Simp's Computer listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teardrops On Simp's Computer. Since you had some involvement with the Teardrops On Simp's Computer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jekky listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jekky. Since you had some involvement with the Jekky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yo Folks listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yo Folks. Since you had some involvement with the Yo Folks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Flirting With Pie listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flirting With Pie. Since you had some involvement with the Flirting With Pie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Juice, Go To Your Room listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Juice, Go To Your Room. Since you had some involvement with the Juice, Go To Your Room redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your Body Is Wonderful listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Your Body Is Wonderful. Since you had some involvement with the Your Body Is Wonderful redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 18:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply