Welcome!

Hello, Frankieparley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John Maynard Friedman 12:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

A little timesaver

edit

Ref your edit to Fenny Stratford, you might like to know that, rather than write [[inventor|inventors]], you can write [[inventor]]s to get the same result. Compare

Same result! --John Maynard Friedman 16:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot John. That was my first entry on Wikipedia and I am still learning the robes - your advice is welcome! Are you resident in Fenny, by the way? Frankieparley 17:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see you also noticed how to reply on someone's talk page! Did you notice how I used the "nowiki" to explain my point? If you want to do the same, the easiest way is to click the W with a red "No" traffic sign over it on the edit bar. See also beside it? The squiggle means "add my signature", marginally faster than typing --~~~~! --John Maynard Friedman 12:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

So, this is to test John Maynard Friedman's suggestions: [[inventor]]s, as opposed to inventors. And the signiture shortcut: --Frankieparley 05:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC). Cool!Reply

Happy New Year

edit

Thanks. Happy New Year to you as well! --Koppany (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Robert Lowell

edit

I thought about the "Notable inhabitant" appellation some more and remembered Claude Rains, who was buried somewhere in the Lakes Region. Sure enough, the Moultonborough, New Hampshire article lists him as a notable inhabitant, so I guess we have a precedent! Thanks for putting up your very interesting piece of info. --Ken Gallager 14:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mocanita06 (Turda-Buru).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cluj-Napoca

edit

Orice modificări la articol sunt binevenite. În plus, engleza mea nu este perfectă, motiv pentru care apreciez mult corecturile şi vă invit, dacă puteţi, să corectaţi şi secţiunile mai noi adăugate. Mulţumesc. Cu stimă, Danutz. —Preceding comment was added at 03:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Am propus articolul pentru a primi statutul de articol de calitate, însă cererea mea a fost repsinsă. Au existat multe obiecţii (chiar multe care nu aveau nicio legătură cu criteriile pentru WP:FA), şi le-am îndeplinit până acum pe toate (mai puţin unele dintre ele care erau păreri personale, şi nu ţineau strict de criteriile pentru articole de calitate). Acest lucru îl poţi vedea pe această pagină, unde se află conţinutul de la Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cluj-Napoca/archive1, la care am adăugat comentariile mele despre ce s-a făcut şi ce nu. A mai rămas doar textul articolului (proza), care după cum relatează ceilalţi utilizatori nu este foarte corect (calitatea limbii engleze folosite este slabă). Am înscris articolul pe pagina Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors/Requests, numai că va dura destul de mult până ce se va găsi un corector ortografic, care să verifice articolul. De aceea dacă ai timp, te invit şi pe tine să faci unele corecturi la articol. Cu mulţumiri, --Danutz (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Salut Danutz. Sunt in Anglia acuma. I will try to get on to this soon. I would be happy to help you, if the task does not take too much time. Cu stima!--Frankieparley (talk) 18:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Voting

edit

Hi! Here is a voting about Bendery/Bender/Tighina: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bender%2C_Moldova#Statement_of_Title_Solution--80.142.252.220 (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Romania

edit
 
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Frankieparley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bratsch (band) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bratsch (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bratsch (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 21:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply