Welcome, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have reverted your change to German Village because you did not preserve any of the existing material in the article; you instead replaced everything with your new information, which failed to preserve much of the content. Please accommodate the additions you wish to make to the article with what is already present rather than starting over. Cheers, Postdlf (talk) 18:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to German Village, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. If your information is sourced, you can add it to the article, but do not delete the information that is currently in the article (without discussion on the talk page first). —C.Fred (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you have concerns with the accuracy of the sources, you need to explain the edits. I would suggest explain the problems on the talk page. Further, if you can provide sources that contradict what is already written, that makes it easier for other editors to independently verify the text. Once consensus is reached on the talk page, then you can make the change. —C.Fred (talk) 00:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply