Francisca.news24

A belated welcome!

Apologies for the late welcome, but the beer is still cold!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions to this project. Here are some the links that maybe helpful as you continue to edit:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

Enjoy contributing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!Packerfan386beer here 09:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your guidance and advice Francisca.news24 (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jamal Khashoggi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2] MrOllie (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

June 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Public policy research. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:24FC:9BFF:FEF4:2932 (talk) 03:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Advocacy Unified Network moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Advocacy Unified Network. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 17:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Francisca.news24. Thank you for your work on Public policy research. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs work per the tag already placed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Advocacy Unified Network (2)

Hello, Francisca.news24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Advocacy Unified Network (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Advocacy Unified Network (2)

Hello, Francisca.news24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Advocacy Unified Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello Francisca.news24. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Francisca.news24. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Francisca.news24|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cultural Preservation Policy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cultural Preservation Policy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The article above didn't quite qualify for G11 deletion, but it's not ready to be in mainspace either. First, it appears to be AI/chatbot generated (especially since the comment on the talk page definitely is), and articles with those often have problems both of misrepresenting (or even wholly making up) sources, and secondly of inserting chunks of text which are copyright violations. It is also quite inappropriate in tone and certainly not neutrally written. Accordingly, I've moved it to draft, at Draft:Cultural Preservation Policy. If it can be cleaned up in tone and carefully checked to ensure that there are no copyright violations and that the material in the article matches the sources, it might at that time be possible to return it to mainspace. Going forward, please refrain from using chatbots, especially to write actual articles; they almost always end up making a mess. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Also, please note the message above which asked if you are editing for pay. An answer to that question is required before you make any more edits. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Drmies (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I share these concerns, and I note that you didn't address the basic question ("do you have a conflict of interest") until just now, in an AI-generated message on a user's talk page, which gives me no reason to believe you were truthful. Drmies (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)