Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 07:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bryce (talk | contribs) 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Forresbj. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 02:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 :- ) DCS 02:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Sender Films edit

Forresbj,

I did not realize what I was getting into. :-p  I started cutting, and cutting, and cutting.

  1. Please do not try to circumvent the Wiki formatting with <br /> changing the size of Section Headers, etc.
  2. Do not use any of these words please:  Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch.
  3. The Wikipedia is supposed to contain factual information, it does not have to be boring, but we are not trying to get million of people rushing to the video store.
  4. As soon as you start writing about people involved, unless they are dead, we have to conform to WP:BLP, which means every statement that could be questionable, must be backed up by a citation.

I cut a bunch of peacock stuff.  The other stuff which I was not comfortable just chopping out I marked with tags, meaning either tone it down or provide a citation.  Perhaps you can poke around and find a better editor to help, or I know a few I might be able to impose on.  I'm more of a technical type person, i.e., really boring.  I wish I had a few hours to work on it, but...

Have a crack at bringing your article down to a neutral tone.  You can leave a note on my talk page and I can have another look at it, or leave a note at the Help Desk and just ask an reviewer to have a look at it before submitting it again.  I think the company definitely meets the notability requirements, at this point the article is just to much hype for the Wiki.  If you have any questions, just ask me or the help desk.

Good luck and thanks for your efforts,   :- ) DCS 03:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Forresbj. You have new messages at Dcshank's talk page.
Message added 00:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

 :- ) DCS 00:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Much better, I still think the Films section could be toned down a little, but they are action adventure films, maybe it's okay.  :- ) DCS 16:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Nick Rosen (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaron Booth (talk) 05:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Filmmaker Nick Rosen.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Filmmaker Nick Rosen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand? edit

 
Hello! Forresbj, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Forresbj. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 14:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 :- ) DCS 14:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey edit

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to wikiFeed edit

Hi Forresbj,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! FifthCrow (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reel Rock Film Tour concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reel Rock Film Tour, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Reel Rock Film Tour was accepted edit

 
Reel Rock Film Tour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anne Delong (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply