Your submission at Articles for creation: Shawn Alexander Thompson (May 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ForTheLoveOfTheGame1513! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ForTheLoveOfTheGame1513 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ForTheLoveOfTheGame1513 (talk) 00:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seeing if you can provide assistance on what other forms of references you would be needing to authenticate the details found therein. I had modeled the page after another actors page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Sporleder) and I noted that he has 3 references:

The first doesn't go to anything that pertains to him. The second IS an actual article that includes mention of him. The third is a dead link.

And then his IMDB link is referenced in external links.

So I'm trying to understand what additional qualifications the page I'm proposing would need as it seems it already includes more than his. Obviously additional movie links can be added to validate Mr. Thompson's involvement with those projects: The Movie Database https://watch.plex.tv/person/shawn-alexander-thompson https://moviefit.me/persons/1849978-shawn-alexander-thompson https://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/shawn-alexander-thompson/yJOmbDc3QqXiE952Ty8dD1/main/\ https://www.digit.in/digit-binge/actor/shawn-alexander-thompson/ https://www.filmaffinity.com/au/search.php?stype=cast&sn&stext=Shawn%20Alexander%20Thompson

But as I understand it, those sites (and MANY others that I could list) are merely created from data-pulls from both IMDB and The Movie Database (as those are deemed "reliable sources"). So...if you are able to help to clarify what more Mr. Thompson can provide above and beyond what he has (which seems to be more than Mr. Sporleder has that has a published page presently), I'll research and see what additional sources can be found.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

I answered your question at the Teahouse. Cullen328 (talk) 20:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi ForTheLoveOfTheGame1513! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with "submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shawn Alexander Thompson (June 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing suggests Thompson meets the the notability guidelines for actors (no sources or indication of significant roles in notable work). His charity's website is not a reliable source. Other coverage is local.
S0091 (talk) 20:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply