Fontana Pharmacy

Welcome!

Hello, Fontana Pharmacy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Fontana Pharmacy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fontana Pharmacy

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Fontana Pharmacy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please re-read the instructions on the block notice on your talk page. Please read (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations) our Faq for organizations.

To be unblocked:

• You must propose a new username that meets the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CORPNAME) username policy.
• You must confirm that this account is used by (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWP:NOSHARE) one individual only.
• You must agree to avoid creating or directly editing about (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI) your organization or product., though (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ WP:ER) requested edits will still be permitted.
• You must agree to not link to your organization's website.
• You must agree to abide by the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TOU) Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. and (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:PAID) disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy.
• You must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future. If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organization, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OUTLETS) alternative outlets.

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your proposed new username" and "Your reason here "--

{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}. 

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

(Any other admin should feel free to amend these conditions or unblock at their discretion.)

UTRS appeal #43033 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please re-read the instructions on the block notice on your talk page. Please read (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations) our Faq for organizations.

To be unblocked:

• You must propose a new username that meets the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CORPNAME) username policy.
• You must confirm that this account is used by (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWP:NOSHARE) one individual only.
• You must agree to avoid creating or directly editing about (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI) your organization or product., though (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ WP:ER) requested edits will still be permitted.
• You must agree to not link to your organization's website.
• You must agree to abide by the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TOU) Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. and (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:PAID) disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy.
• You must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future. If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organization, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OUTLETS) alternative outlets.

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your proposed new username" and "Your reason here "--

{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}. 

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

(Any other admin should feel free to amend these conditions or unblock at their discretion.)

UTRS appeal #43443 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I see, it was the UTRS queue. Please follow instructions. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS decline You have made yet another UTRS unblock request, UTRS appeal #44159, which adds nothing significant to what you said in the previous two, so not surprisingly it too has been declined. For convenience of reference, the following is a copy of the decline message posted at UTRS.

Let's start with the fact that the responses to your two previous unblock requests have BOTH told you to make unblock requests on the talk page of your account, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fontana_Pharmacy. UTRS is for unblock requests which can't be posted to a user talk page, usually because the talk page acces has been removed, which is not so in your case. Next: you seem to have failed to grasp that editing to "educate" the public about what you think is "the good the company has done", and persuade people that your company "has contributed so much to Jamaica" is precisely why your account has been blocked: that is called "editing for promotion", which is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. You are not going to be unblocked in order to allow you to continue to do exactly the things which the block is designed to stop. It is also perhaps worth mentioning another point which is a reason why unblocking you would in any case serve no useful purpose. Your saying "there is no reputable platform or source of information" and other things to the same effect means that your company does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and so is not suitable to be the subject of an article. Wikipedia seeks only to have information on subjects for which there ARE already reliable sources giving substantial coverage to the subject. We do not seek to help to make more publicly visible subjects which have not yet received substantial coverage in independent sources; that is, in fact, another aspect of promotional editing. If you want there to be a single source for people to find all about the wonderful wqork you think your business does, then there's a very obvious place for you to put that: it's your business's own web site. That is not the kind of thing that Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) 21:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)