Fluffycat345

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Fluffycat345, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kylie Cosmetics into Kris Jenner. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Walliams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Britain. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Happily888. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Happily888 (talk) 08:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fluffycat345. Thank you for your work on Hot Nights With Abbie Chatfield. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of Neighbours characters (2023), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Deleting information is one thing, splitting list entries without proving GNG is another. This is now disruptive to the article so please be more mindful when editing it in future. Rain the 1 11:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Neighbours characters (2024). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Not sourcing Sasha McLain's first appearance date, removing sourced content from Alyssa Gavalas and adding incorrect information to Chelsea Murphy Rain the 1 18:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to List of Neighbours characters (2024) did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Rain the 1 09:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stranger Things season 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eduardo Franco.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Attribution and advice

Hey, I hope you are doing well. I am sorry that I reverted your page creation of Chelsea Murphy - however, the content was copied from List of Neighbours characters (2024) without attribution, which is unfair to the editors who added that content and is required (see WP:Copying within Wikipedia. If you do split off a page in the future, I would strongly recommend putting it in the edit summary and talk page (Something along the lines of "Copied content from x page, see there for attribution history"). However, I do think the reception section should be worked on first of all before a page split is considered. The character is notable but the reception needs to be added and more real world perspective is needed before it passes GNG.

Please let me know if you have any questions at all or need any help! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

In addition to the above there were numerous issues that were presented in your creation of Chelsea Murphy. I understand you may want an article for your favourite soap opera characters, but first you must demonstrate notability. From a first glance, the general reader would assume there were plenty of sources on the article. However, you actually used the same sources numerous times and dressed them up as separate references. You could benefit from reading Wikipedia:Citing sources, which will help you understand how to cite sources since you formatted dates inconsistently and missed out author names from every source. In addition, using mirrored news reporting services like Yahoo! News, which blatantly makes no effort to differentiate from the original Digital Spy source. These sources offer no additional reporting or original content present from the Digital Spy article. BacktotheBay is a fansite and an example of a non WP:RS source. Also when citing social media content, you need to home in on the post ID in the reference field rather than just copying the URL of the website. There are dedicated citation templates to help with this and it makes fact checking easier for other editors.Rain the 1 08:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)