User talk:Fluffernutter/Archive 19

Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 16 July 2014
Archive 15 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 25

06:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

08:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

08:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyedit Request

It must be summer because I wrote an article in a single night. Would you please look over The Scoutmaster. merci. --Guerillero | My Talk 03:29, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

GOCE June 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors May 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
 

Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 51 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2,987 articles to 2,236 articles in May, the lowest backlog total since we began keeping records in 2009! Since at least 300 new articles were tagged during May, that means we copy edited over 1,000 articles in a single month. Amazing work, everyone!

Blitz: The June blitz will run from June 15–21. This blitz's theme is Politics. Sign up here.

Election: You can nominate yourself or others for the role of Coordinator for the second half of 2014 here. Nominations will be accepted until June 14. Voting will begin on June 15 and will conclude on June 28.

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you and a sigh!

Hi Fluffernutter. I just wanted to thank you personally for removing this editor from AfC reviewing. The behaviour has been simply appalling and bordering on trolling. I have rescued the following three articles which he declined for spurious reasons, at a rate of 2 minutes per article: Washington State Auditor, Standard Theatre (Philadelphia), and Rainer Schmidt (landscape architect). This does so much damage to the effort to recruit and keep new editors, overcome systemic bias, and expand the encyclopedia. All of his AfC reviews will have to be redone. His block should never have been overturned. Can anything be done about it? No sooner is he stopped from wreaking havoc in one area of Wikipedia, and he heads off to another. He's also trolling the Teahouse ([69], [70]) In the latter, his reply to the new user was completely off the wall. He clearly hadn't even read their sandbox or the article they wished to improve. {{{SIGH}}}. Voceditenore (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

@Voceditenore: Yeah, that whole situation is a mess. I'm honestly not sure if it's that he's just unaware that he's doing things wrong, that he doesn't care that he's doing things wrong, or that he's deliberately doing things wrong. Since he's been community-sanctioned before, the way to go if you feel his editing needs to be stopped entirely would probably be to post a request on AN or ANI asking for his block to be reinstated and/or for a community ban to be imposed (though they amount to largely the same thing at this point). A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
The editor has now been re-blocked with a block time of "indefinite". That said, I've commented in detail on two of the declines mentioned above here at WT:AFC. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

07:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

07:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

07:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunate

I'm sorry you're feeling exhausted by the fighting that comes with the territory of editing (or administrating) Wikipedia. It's unfortunate if you're feeling burned out. I actually came here looking for help with another user. You were the admin who made it clear to me that I don't have the right to speak abusively to other users, not even on my own User Talk page. I'm having problems with a guy called Parrot of Doom. As you can see from the top of his User Talk page, he says:

"Some basic rules. One, anyone coming here accusing me of WP:OWN will be told in no uncertain terms where to shove it. Two, anyone whinging about WP:CIVIL will be referred to the previous answer."

I think that's a pretty destructive attitude. The fact is, those are the very articles he needs to review and take seriously (along with WP:ONLYREVERT). The fact that he felt compelled to make these "rules" is pretty good evidence that he's had an ongoing problem with abusing other Users. So I looked through some archives and yes, yes he is routinely abusive to other users. He's actually been comparitively more civil to me. Our problems with each other stemmed from the article The Final Cut (album), with him reverting my good-faith, source-citing edits without explanation, and not really participating in any discussion on the article's Talk page, as I asked him to. He did accuse me of acting "childish" and throwing a "tantrum", which wasn't true. But I got off easy compared to how he speaks to others.

For details, you could read my comment on his User:Talk page, which lists some examples of him being personally insulting in his Edit Summaries and article Talk pages. You might even notice the comment above mine, where he is quoted as saying "oh fuckoff" and "get fucked" to another user (just as I was calling another user "fuckface" on my Talk page before you stepped in). I was wrong then, and now I'm trying to do the right thing, so I thought I'd refer you to him. But if you're not up for it, I totally understand. Myself, I've mostly not been participating on Wikipedia lately, due to things exactly like this. I wish you the best either way.

--Ben Culture (talk) 06:33, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic

Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic
 

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Central Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

1pm–8pm at southwest section of the Great Lawn, north of the Delacorte Theater.

Also, before the picnic, you can join in the Wikimedia NYC chapter's annual meeting.

11:30am-12:30pm at Yeoryia Studios, 2067 Broadway.

We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

GOCE July 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

06:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias

Hello! Could you also protect Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias talk page? That user is now vandalizing it.[146] --Lecen (talk) 19:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lecen: It only seems to have happened once so far; we generally try not to protect talk pages if we can avoid it (not least because that's where this dispute ought to be being hashed out). I'm keeping an eye on things and will consider protecting the talk if there's a lot more, but for the moment I don't think protection is warranted. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

07:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

07:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

07:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)